#int_ext and, inline and "Different Levels of Indirecti

[Peter]

Hello there.

I'm fooling around PIC16F684 and when trying to implement the interrupt #int_ext , compiler says about different levels of indirection.

Let's say the code looks as follows:
void doSth(int& data)
{
data= ...... ;
}

#int_ext
void myfunc1(void)
{
int i;

for (i=4; i--;)
doSth(dataOne[i], 8); // <== different levels of indirection!!!
}

I also have noticed that doSth is treated by CCS compiler like an inline function (just in scope of myFunc1). This is - I guess - the source of the issue. How to overcome this? I could give up on this loop and call doSth 4 times, but it takes each time a huge chunk of the program memory that I'm getting short of!


Cheers,
Peter.

[Peter]

Just forgotten, when passing pointer rather than a reference, the same thing happens! So the following doesn't work:

void doSth(int* pdata, int secondpar)
{
*pdata= ...... ;
}

[Peter]

Right, false alarm! Sorry. Checked this code once more and this was owing to a reference parameter as expected!

Cheers,
Peter.