CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

PIC10F206 and printf/delay_ms problem

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PIC10F206 and printf/delay_ms problem
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:11 am     Reply with quote

Hello forum,

I have this small program:

.c file:
Code:
#include "main.h"

void main()
{
   setup_comparator(NC_NC);   // Disable comparator outputs

   // Set the tristating for the IO port.
   // TRIS is not a physical register, so it must be set using TRIS.
   #asm
      //Set the GP pins.
      //GP0: output
      //GP1: output
      //GP2: output
      //GP3: input
      MOVLW 0b00000000
      MOVWF GPIO
      MOVLW 0b11111000
      TRIS  GPIO
     
      // Set the OPTION register.
      MOVLW 0b11000000
      OPTION
   #endasm

   delay_ms(500);

   printf("Test1");
}



.h file:
Code:
#include <10F206.h>

#FUSES NOWDT                    //No Watch Dog Timer
#FUSES NOMCLR                   //Master Clear pin used for I/O
#FUSES NOPROTECT                //Code not protected from reading

#use delay(clock=4000000)

#use rs232(baud=9600,parity=N,xmit=PIN_B1,bits=8)

#byte GPIO = 0x06
#bit GP0 = GPIO.0
#bit GP1 = GPIO.1
#bit GP2 = GPIO.2
#bit GP3 = GPIO.3

#byte TMR0 = 0x01


When I use the line delay_ms(500); nothing is printed from the PIC. If I remove the line, the PIC will print "Test1".

Why does the delay_ms prevent the PIC from outputting the text?

The output pin is GP1. No external components except the RS-232 driver input is connected to the PIC.


Regards,
Futterama
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:16 am     Reply with quote

First, why the assembler?. The compiler is quite happy to handle the TRIS and option for you.
Have you tried loading the code into MPLAB, or looked at the fuse bits in your programmer? What you describe, would happen, if the watchdog was not disabled.
How is the RS232 receive connected?. To what pin?.
Have you got anything connected to the MCLR pin?. If not, try putting a resistor to one supply rail on this pin. The MCLR pin, even if disabled, can trigger a reset, if it sees a signal that goes outside the supply rail.

Best Wishes
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:30 am     Reply with quote

Ttelmah wrote:
First, why the assembler?. The compiler is quite happy to handle the TRIS and option for you.

Because there is a problem with the compiler handling the TRIS, I have read this in several threads - and of course I can't find these threads right now...

Ttelmah wrote:
Have you tried loading the code into MPLAB, or looked at the fuse bits in your programmer? What you describe, would happen, if the watchdog was not disabled.

No, I guess the watchdog should be disabled because I've got the NOWDT fuse. My programmer (PICkit2) shows: "Configuration: 0008". I have no idea how to read the fuses, and I can't seem to find anything about fuses in the PIC10F206 datasheet. I'm not sure what you mean by loading the code into MPLAB.

Ttelmah wrote:
How is the RS232 receive connected?. To what pin?.

I wrote this in my first post, pin GP2 and the pin i directly connected to the MAX232 input pin.

Ttelmah wrote:
Have you got anything connected to the MCLR pin? If not, try putting a resistor to one supply rail on this pin. The MCLR pin, even if disabled, can trigger a reset, if it sees a signal that goes outside the supply rail.

Nothing connected here, I'll try the resistor.


Last edited by Futterama on Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:50 am; edited 2 times in total
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:38 am     Reply with quote

OK, I figured out the FUSES vs. Configuration Word vs. WDT issue. I didn't realise that the fuses was the same thing as the configuration word. The WDT IS disabled.
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:48 am     Reply with quote

Adding the resistor to the MCLR pin does not help.
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:01 am     Reply with quote

Ttelmah wrote:
First, why the assembler?. The compiler is quite happy to handle the TRIS and option for you.

I tried to replace
Code:
      MOVLW 0b00000000
      MOVWF GPIO
      MOVLW 0b11111000
      TRIS  GPIO

with
Code:
#use fast_io(b)
set_tris_b(0b11111000);

and the asm code in the .lst file seems to be the same.

How do I set the OPTION register with C-code?
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:07 am     Reply with quote

By the way, If I output a char before the delay_ms(500); both that char and the chars after the delay will be output. I guess is must have something to do with the PC's UART timeout / startbit / delay from power up to first output char from PIC.
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:32 am     Reply with quote

The option register is set by the 'setup_wdt' function, so:

setup_wdt(DISABLE_PULLUPS|DISABLE_WAKEUP_ON_CHANGE);

will do what you currently do with this part of the assembler. I do remember there being some tris problems with these chips, but they were about 100 code releases ago!.
Try setting the serial output line high at the start of the code. I suspect you may have a problem because the line sits 'low', resulting in the PC seeing the pause as a 'break. So if you set pin B1 at the start of the code, it may fix the behaviour.

Best Wishes
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:57 am     Reply with quote

Looking at the .lst file, your suggestion seems to take a lot of code space, and in these devices, you should save codespace where possible...

Code:
....................       // Set the OPTION register.
....................       // Enable pin pull-ups.
....................       // Assign prescaler to Timer0 and set it to 1:16
....................       MOVLW 0b11000011
004C:  MOVLW  C3
....................       OPTION
004D:  OPTION
....................    #endasm
.................... 
.................... setup_wdt(DISABLE_PULLUPS|DISABLE_WAKEUP_ON_CHANGE);
004E:  MOVLW  C0
004F:  MOVWF  08
0050:  MOVLW  07
0051:  CLRF   01
0052:  MOVLW  0F
0053:  OPTION
0054:  CLRWDT
0055:  MOVF   08,W
0056:  OPTION
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:14 am     Reply with quote

Normally the function simply takes the value that the constants combine to form, and do a single option instruction to set them. The reason it is doing so much work, is because you are already setting the counter value first
You'd want to use:
setup_counters(DISABLE_PULLUPS|DISABLE_WAKEUP_ON_CHANGE|RTCC_DIV_16);

Which should do everything in one hit.

Does setting the pin high, fix the RS232 problem?.

Best Wishes
Futterama



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 98

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 1:17 pm     Reply with quote

setup_counters(DISABLE_PULLUPS|DISABLE_WAKEUP_ON_CHANGE|RTCC_DIV_16);

is not a valid syntax, it needs commas:

Syntax: setup_counters (rtcc_state, ps_state)

Also, the setup_wdt() is still doing lots of work without me setting the counter value first:

Code:
.................... 
....................    setup_comparator(NC_NC);   // Disable comparator outputs
0044:  MOVLW  27
0045:  MOVWF  07
0046:  MOVF   00,W
0047:  MOVLW  03
0048:  MOVWF  08
0049:  DECFSZ 08,F
004A:  GOTO   049
004B:  MOVF   07,W
.................... 
.................... setup_wdt(DISABLE_PULLUPS|DISABLE_WAKEUP_ON_CHANGE|RTCC_DIV_16);
004C:  MOVLW  C3
004D:  MOVWF  08
004E:  MOVLW  07
004F:  CLRF   01
0050:  MOVLW  0F
0051:  OPTION
0052:  CLRWDT
0053:  MOVF   08,W
0054:  OPTION
.................... 
....................    set_tris_b(0b11111000);
0055:  MOVLW  F8
0056:  TRIS   6
.................... 


I can see the setup_comparator() is also doing lots of work, that's why I usually just read the datasheet and do things myself (in C, I'm not very familiar with ASM). I seldom use the builtin functions for setup - reading the datasheet is also a good way to learn how things work.

Ttelmah wrote:
Does setting the pin high, fix the RS232 problem?
I don't know, for some reason I can reproduce the error now...
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group