CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

Timer0 configuration problem in pic 18f4550

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pavas



Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 4

View user's profile Send private message

Timer0 configuration problem in pic 18f4550
PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:46 pm     Reply with quote

I have problems to put my timer0 to count 1s, if I'm right this confiuration set my PIC to oscilate at 48MHz with a xtal of 20MHz. Then the cicle is
: (1/48000000)*4 ~= 8 uS to timer0 add by 1. But this code don't work, someone can tell me why???

Code:

#include <18F4550.h>

#fuses HSPLL,NOWDT,NOPROTECT,NOLVP,NODEBUG,USBDIV,PLL5,CPUDIV1,VREGEN

#use delay(clock=48000000)

#include ".\include\usb_cdc.h"

long cont=0;
int segundos=0;

#int_timer0 //Trata a iterrupção gerada pelo TIMER 0
void trata_tmr0 () {
      set_timer0(0);
      cont++;
      if(cont == 125000) { // ( 1s/0.000008s) = 125000
         segundos++;
         cont=0;
         printf(usb_cdc_putc,"Seconds: %u",segundos);
         printf(usb_cdc_putc,"\r\n ");
      }
}

void main() {
   delay_ms(300);
   usb_cdc_init();
   usb_init();
   while(!usb_cdc_connected()) {}

   setup_timer_0 (RTCC_DIV_1);

   set_timer0(0);

   enable_interrupts (INT_TIMER0);

   while (true);
}


Thx.
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 10:04 pm     Reply with quote

You also need to enable global interrupts. Example:
Code:

enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER0);
enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);

while(1);
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:09 am     Reply with quote

Actually, I don't think that is the problem. The interrupts should be enabled in the USB code (unless the poster has altered this to use polling, instead of interrupts).
There are several other potential problems though.
Does the terminal package being used send a 'set_line_coding' message?. If not, then the usb_cdc_connected call will never return 'true'.
The other problem though is probably that the processor has not got time to handle the USB. With the code set to use interrupts at this frequency, they will be set again only a little while after the interrupt handler exits, which could result in an effective processor 'deadlock' condition...

Best Wishes
inservi



Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 128

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:54 am     Reply with quote

Hello,

If i well understand, 'cont' is a long (16bits) then, it can never be equal to 125000, what do you think about ?

dro.
_________________
in médio virtus
pavas



Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 4

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:46 am     Reply with quote

Quote:

Actually, I don't think that is the problem. The interrupts should be enabled in the USB code (unless the poster has altered this to use polling, instead of interrupts).
There are several other potential problems though.
Does the terminal package being used send a 'set_line_coding' message?. If not, then the usb_cdc_connected call will never return 'true'.


The terminal and the PIC work right. I know because the string envoy to PC was ok.
Quote:

The other problem though is probably that the processor has not got time to handle the USB. With the code set to use interrupts at this frequency, they will be set again only a little while after the interrupt handler exits, which could result in an effective processor 'deadlock' condition...


Perhaps this is my problem, can you tell me what I have to do?? Use a minor frequency to clock setting a diferrent PLL scaler??? Or another sugestion???

Thx again.....
pavas



Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 4

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:18 am     Reply with quote

Hey someone can help me pls????
There´s some wrong with the compiler????
mskala



Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 100
Location: Massachusetts, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:45 am     Reply with quote

inservi wrote:
Hello,

If i well understand, 'cont' is a long (16bits) then, it can never be equal to 125000, what do you think about ?

dro.


Please read above by inservi.

Type 'long' in CCS is same as int16. A 16-bit value cannot be higher than 65536, and you are comparing it to 125000.
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:07 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
Then the cicle is: (1/48000000)*4 ~= 8 uS to timer0 add by 1.
This is wrong, it takes about 0.08us for Timer0 to increase by 1.
The timer interrupt is generated every timer overflow, i.e. depending on the timer configuration this is every 256 or 65536 ticks (configure as 8 or 16 bit counter).

Interrupts do have a lot of overhead, so for best performance it is best to minimize the number of interrupts per second.
Code:
   setup_timer_0 (RTCC_DIV_1);
This will give you 48MHz / (4 * 1 * 65536) = 183 interrupts per second.
Change to RTCC_DIV_16 for about 11 interrupts per second.

In your interrupt handler you are resetting the timer to zero, this is not required. The interrupt fires on timer overflow. The timer starts counting from 0 automatically, manually resetting to zero causes an offset error.

Code:
int8 cont=0;
int8 segundos=0;

#int_timer0 //Trata a iterrupção gerada pelo TIMER 0
void trata_tmr0 () {
      cont++;
      if (cont >= 11) { // about 11 interrupts per second
         segundos++;
         cont=0;
         printf(usb_cdc_putc,"Seconds: %u \r\n",segundos);
      }
}


I'm no USB expert so can't help you on the other aspects.
Please describe in more details what behavior you see and how this is different from what you expect.
What is the version number of the compiler you are using?
pavas



Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 4

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:28 am     Reply with quote

ckielstra THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!

My problem was so stupid!!!!

The PIC had the timer pre-configured to 16bits and I tought it was 8bits UAUHAUHAUHAUHHA

THX for help and srry about my stupid question....
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group