CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support
spi_read() vs. spi_read(0)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
javick82



Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 43

View user's profile Send private message

spi_read() vs. spi_read(0)
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:53 pm     Reply with quote
I am getting different responses from the hardware when using these two commands. Can anyone shed some light on why this may be the case?

While I have your attention, anyone have a driver for eeprom 25LC256, maybe even configured for the picdem.net 2 board? Wink

Actually, another rider question to that is would you forsee any problems using the ENC28J60 chip onboard the picdem.net 2 board and that eeprom chip, which are both on the SPI interface?
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:17 pm     Reply with quote
Quote:
I am getting different responses from the hardware when using
these two commands

See the post at the end of this thread:
http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27294


Quote:
Anyone have a driver for eeprom 25LC256.

See this thread. It may help. It has code for a 25LC320 and 25LC640:
http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28199
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group