CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

CAN Example Change Frequency
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
newby



Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 32

View user's profile Send private message

Optimal CAN settings for long distance communications ?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:21 pm     Reply with quote

I would like to use CAN for communications between uCs over distances > 100m.
The baud rate is not the problem, 50 - 100 kbits are enough.

I am also able to use the CAN bit timing calculators, but i need an advice how to set the different phases in an optimal way for this purpose.

The AN574 which should deal with this topic, is no longer available at the microchip homepage.

How should i set the different quantas and so on ?

Thanks for any helpful advice !
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:46 am     Reply with quote

It's actually AN754. That was a typo. Thanks for pointing that out.
I will edit the post and fix it. Here's the link to AN754:
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/AppNotes/00754.pdf
newby



Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 32

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:57 am     Reply with quote

AN754 is very interesting, also according to osc accuracy.

I am facing the following problems now:
- I use the CCS CAN-test board
- With the standard CAN settings used in the examples, 125 kbit
- My external CAN-board uses an 8 MHz ceramic resonator, CAN also configured for 125 kBits, 18F2680
- The test board uses the PCA82C251, my board the MCP2551


Problem:
If I connect my board (CAN-L/H, VSS, VDD) to the CCS test board using CAN-H and CAN-L (of the MCP2551), I am not able to establish a functioning connection.
If I don't use the MCP2551 and wire directly from the TX and RX pins of the uC to the TX and RX pins of the CCS-CAN test board, then everything works fine....

As far as I know the PCA82C251 and MCP2551 should work together - but they don't ?
I checked the connections and soldering of the MCP2551, seems to be fine. I also get an output out of the MCP2551.

Is there anything else I have to keep in mind ?!?
newguy



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 1907

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:08 am     Reply with quote

The PCA82C251 may not have built-in pullups. Here is a thread that may deal with a similar situation: http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23825&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

The important post is the last one on the first page, by PCM.
newby



Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 32

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:05 am     Reply with quote

Well, if i connect the CAN-boards using the CAN-L/H lines (MCP2551) then there are 15 small spikes on the TX of the 18F2680.
If i connect per RX and TX directly without MCP2551, i see a different pattern (far more complex) and the connection is working.

Is the MCP2551 not "strong enough" to take over the CAN-Bus ? Iīm not an expert but is this pattern (15 peaks) a sign that the 18F2860 is waiting and not able to get a "call connected signal" ?

I tried a 1kOhm PU on the TX line from the 18F2680, change nothing in both cases (using TX & RX and CAN-L/H). I donīt think that i need a PU, i can see the signal on the RX & TX without PU.
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:31 am     Reply with quote

Small spikes like this are common, where required resistors are not present. As the driver gates switch, there is enough internal capacitance to induce a tiny 'edge'on the signal lines. Have you got the terminating resistor present between Can-H, and Can-L at the end of the bus?. Normally 120R at each end of the bus. These are _required_, both providing signal termination, and a DC path for the drive outputs (which for Can-L, is a 'pull-down' only device, and for Can-H, a 'pull-up' only device). Without these, the bus will almost certainly be reporting a permanent 'dominant' state, which will prevent the PIC from being able to drive the bus.

Best Wishes
newby



Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 32

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:15 am     Reply with quote

Well i found the mistake, a quite stupid one.

It was not the 120 Ohm resistor, I don't use one because for the distances and bit rates I use at the moment, I don't need one.

According to the datasheet of the MCP2551, the slew rate (V/us) of the signals can be influenced using an additional resistor called Rset. This Rset can be selected according to a figure and this figure shows that the slew rate doesn't change anymore with increasing resistance above about 100 kOhm - it levels out asymptotically.
Because I didn't know which slew rate I need and just thought "if all values above 100 kOhm" gives the same result, I don't use a resistor which means Rset = xyz MOhm and that?s OK..... But it wasn't ! I have put in a 10 kOhm resistor and from that on it works !

Thanks to all of you guys !
Pedr0



Joined: 08 Sep 2008
Posts: 3

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:49 am     Reply with quote

Someone knows what I have to change to have 250kbps with a 20MHz crystal ?
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:06 am     Reply with quote

The post given on page 1 of this thread has full instructions.
Follow the instructions and do it.
Tufican



Joined: 23 Feb 2011
Posts: 10
Location: Turkey- izmir

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:48 pm     Reply with quote

newby wrote:
Well i found the mistake, a quite stupid one.

It was not the 120 Ohm resistor, I don't use one because for the distances and bit rates I use at the moment, I don't need one.

According to the datasheet of the MCP2551, the slew rate (V/us) of the signals can be influenced using an additional resistor called Rset. This Rset can be selected according to a figure and this figure shows that the slew rate doesn't change anymore with increasing resistance above about 100 kOhm - it levels out asymptotically.
Because I didn't know which slew rate I need and just thought "if all values above 100 kOhm" gives the same result, I don't use a resistor which means Rset = xyz MOhm and that?s OK..... But it wasn't ! I have put in a 10 kOhm resistor and from that on it works !

Thanks to all of you guys !


Hi guys
I have a stupid problem and I can't solve this :(

I can set my baudrates 50k 100k 150k 200k.
But I can't see 250k and 500k.
why??

Its not a software problem :( I'm using your codes
and I'm using original ccs c canbus development kit :((
Please help me.

When I set my baud rate to 500k,
I see this from logic analyzer. This loop forever.


But when I set again to <200,
I see this true one.


I check my registers.
I check my program.
I check everything but i cant increase my baudrate from200k. :((
Please help me.

can be my bus line resistors is unaviable to high speed can

i look my resistors between can h and can L
its 7k ohm
i think its must be 120 ohm ?


Last edited by Tufican on Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:34 pm; edited 2 times in total
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:55 pm     Reply with quote

You should have asked this in your CAN bus baudrate thread from earlier
this week. You should still continue it there, instead of here:
http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=46445

But, to get help you need to answer these questions:
What's your PIC for this test ?

What is the oscillator frequency for the PIC ?

What's your CCS compiler version ?

Where's your (very short, but compilable) test program so we can try to
duplicate the problem ? By short, I mean 20 lines, if you can. I don't
mean 100 or 200 lines. We don't want to look at long test programs.

Where is the description of how you are connecting your logic analyzer
to the circuit ? What pins on the PIC or CAN bus driver chip is it
connected to ?

In other words, post all the details so we can duplicate your test setup
(both hardware and software) and see the problem and maybe try to
solve it.
tienchuan



Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 175

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger

PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:15 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
But for a short cable and normal drivers, I think 500 ns should work fine

Hi PCM Programmer.
I'm have a trouble when calculate propagation time delay to config baud speed.
I'm building a CAN network with 40 node, bus length about less than 250m, at one node I used PIC18F4680(integrated CAN driver ) and MCP2551 to transceiver CAN signal.
I read in App note AN754 and it show:
tprop= 2*(tbus + tcmp+ tdrv)
And I have a question why you calculated 500ns for propagation time delay?
I hope you will soon reply for me.
Thanks and regards !
_________________
Begin Begin Begin !!!
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:09 am     Reply with quote

My advice is to search http://www.google.com for this
Quote:
How to calculate CAN bus propagation time delay

and also search for this:
Quote:
site:microchip.com/forums "CAN bus" propagation time delay
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group