Function Pointer PIC18 CCS bug?

[cubah]

Hallo All
I have sample code which is not working is I'm using function pointer to turn-on red led (LED is turned-on when pin_A0=0)
PS.
I did the same way as shows CCS example "ex_qsort.c" in /examples directory!

#include <18F2550.h>
#byte LATA = 0xF89
#byte TRISA = 0xF92
//#device *=16 // 16 bit pointers

// *** ROM program locations *** //
#build( reset=0x0A00, interrupt=0x0A00+8)
#org 0x0000, 0x0A00-1 { } // bootloader

// CPU clock (config determined in bootloader)
#define FREQ_CPU 48000000 // 48Mhz
#use delay ( CLOCK = FREQ_CPU, RESTART_WDT )

#define LED_RED PIN_A0
#define RED_ON output_low( LED_RED )
#define RED_OFF output_high( LED_RED )

typedef void (*HandlerFun) ();
void hRedOn() {RED_ON;}
void hRedOff() {RED_OFF;}

//----------------------------------------------------------
void main (void)
{
HandlerFun hFun;

delay_ms( 10 ); // need to wait for PLL?
LATA = 0xff; // all leds off!
TRISA = 0x0; // all outputs
delay_ms( 100 );


hRedOn(); // force CCS to this link function
hRedOff();

hFun = hRedOn;
while(1)
{
(*hFun)(); // like in example "ex_sort.c" but here not
working!!!
//goto_address(hFun);// not working also!
//hRedOn(); // WORKING!!!
restart_wdt();
}

return;
}

Ktos zna ten bug?

[Ttelmah]

This is _C_, not C++. There is a very fundamental difference in the way that 'void' is understood.
Seperately though, there is a probable problem with trying to generate addresses for the internal 'functions' output_high, and output_low. These are almost certainly macro definitions, _not_ actual functions.
If you want to use these through pointer accesses, then put each into a wrapper function, and generate the addresses of these. If you look at the 'call tree' for a program, you will see that there is no call ever occuring to these names, making it certain that they are macros, not actual funstions.

Best Wishes