View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ALFA 705
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 9
|
Intruder detect with PIC, any idea ? |
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:20 am |
|
|
Hi,
I'n using 18F8722 and it works in a box. In this project I need to implement an "intruder detect". In other words,
If one cover is removed the PIC has to be able to detect it even if power supply is "OFF".
Of course, no action when power is OFF but when the PIC goes "ON" again, has to detect that cover was removed and attached again.
Do you have an idea, please ?
I would like to avoid to use a battery por this purpose.
I hope you can undestand my poor English.
Thank you.
ALFA 705 |
|
|
valemike Guest
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:43 am |
|
|
I think your PIC needs to be sleeping, and wake up on interrupt, with the interrupt hooked up to a switch that closes when you lift the cover.
You'll need a small battery at least though.
Perhaps maybe the switch in the cover should turn on power to your PIC! So if someone tries to open it up, then it provides power to the PIC. So in your main program, then check this switch upon POR. |
|
|
kender
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 768 Location: Silicon Valley
|
Re: Intruder detect with PIC, any idea ? |
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:25 pm |
|
|
ALFA 705 wrote: | I would like to avoid to use a battery por this purpose. |
It's digfficult tot avoid the battery. What standby time are you expecting?
If you know that when the box will be opened, it's internals will be exposed to light (especially sunlight), you could put solar cells into your box, and power the PIC from them. When the box is closed, the PIC is powered down. When the box is opened, the PIC powers up from the pannels. You avoid the use of the battery, and you solve the detection problem. Use a LF series low power PIC. |
|
|
ALFA 705
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 9
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:24 pm |
|
|
I'm using 18LF8722 at 3.3V.
Solar panels, good idea but It can't secure that works (poor light...). Also, the cost is an important aspect of this project
The expecting time is too large. Weeks... maybe months
The product could be inactive in warehouse for long time.
I know that it's too dificult to resolve it without a little battery.
Thank you for you quick reply !
More ideas ?
ALFA 705 |
|
|
SherpaDoug
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 1640 Location: Cape Cod Mass USA
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:43 pm |
|
|
How about something more mechanical? How about a rotary switch that is spring loaded but held cocked by the lid. When the lid is removed the spring spins the switch. An intruder would know something happened, but without knowing where the switch started there would be no way to reset it and avoid detection. The PIC wakes up sometime later, compares the switch position to what it used to be, and knows something suspicous happened!
And then there are electro-mechanical variants. A mousetrap hits a piezo element generating an electrical signal, a spring loaded magnet moves through a coil, etc.
Of course you would need some sort of a key to hold the spring cocked during assembly. The key could be withdrawn through a small hole under a sticker. Or the key could be a bit of mothball that would dissappear on its own after a period of time.
Tell us more about your application and we can give you better ideas. _________________ The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done. |
|
|
MikeValencia
Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Posts: 238 Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:23 pm |
|
|
How about a Tamper Evident sticker that you stick onto the box's seams. If the customer removes the sticker, it will leave the imprint "VOID IF REMOVED".
Sort of like our license plate state stickers. It falls apart if you try to move it around.
Or why don't you use a padlock!? |
|
|
kender
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 768 Location: Silicon Valley
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:39 pm |
|
|
MikeValencia wrote: | Or why don't you use a padlock!? |
But seriously, the problem of powering something forever without a battery have not been solved for the general case yet. If you solve it, you have a chance to become quite rich. |
|
|
Mark
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 2838 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:40 pm |
|
|
Not sure why you don't want to use a battery, but you probably wouldn't want a super cap either. You could charge the super cap and not have a discharge path except through a switch connected to the box. The voltage of the cap could be read from the micro. If discharged, then the case was opened. Not sure how long the cap could retain a charge. You can do the math. |
|
|
ALFA 705
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 9
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:08 am |
|
|
I try to explain a little more the project.
A PCB with PIC and another components are inside of aluminium box. The box has three lids; two on side and one on top.
The intruder detection only has to be in one of them (lateral).
If power supply (12VDC) is removed from the equipment and the lid is removed, the system has to be able to detect it and send a missage to general quarters with GPRS module (this module is not only for this purpose).
The "Tamper Evident sticker" is not a valid solution, It has to be reversible and works again
This idea of use a super cap is the same that I thought. I have to do the math but I'm not sure about that...
The first idea was to find a component like a "magnetic detect" with "memory" or "latch" (Hall efect or something like that).
I think this is an interesant case for resolve...
Again, thank you and sorry for my English.
ALFA 705 |
|
|
kender
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 768 Location: Silicon Valley
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:37 am |
|
|
ALFA 705 wrote: | ... send a missage to general quarters with GPRS module ... |
You'll need power to make the transmission. How many Watts are we talking here?
My suggestion would be to take a Ni-chemistry battery pack. If you use it sparingly, it will last for a long time during warehousing and shipping.
Alternatively - use am anti-tamper fuse. That way the user will call himself and confess. |
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 3:53 am |
|
|
Kender,
the GPRS tranmision only will be done when power supply goes up again. Not when lid is removed.
The system only has to be able to "memorize" the event and works later (when power "on").
The only power needed is only for "memorize" de event.
ALFA 705 |
|
|
Ttelmah Guest
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:49 am |
|
|
Simple facts:
The PIC cannot do anything without power.
Neither can any other form of 'electronic' ciruit.
Power requirements though can be _tiny_. Look at a digital watch. This has an oscillator running all the time, yet runs for years on a tiny cell.
I'd suggest a CMOS flip-flop, and a switch on the cover. The flip-flop, will have it's reset line operated by the PIC (when this is running), but store the event when the cover switch is operated. The output should have a tri-state buffer, again controllable by the PIC, so no output will be generated when the processor is 'off', to keep consumption to an absolute minimum.
For more information, the CMOS circuitry could even include a counter.
A circuit like this, would typically run for close to the shelf life of a small battery. Something like a CR1216, would give typically 5 to 8 years life operating this.
You would need to ensure that the 'clear' line is not operated by the PIC, till after it has enabled the tri-state buffer, and read the data stored. You could even use a rechargeable battery so that it is recharged when the unit is powered, but the operational life may not improve by much, and this adds more circuitry, since the actual 'design life' of the battery may be reached...
Best Wishes |
|
|
asmallri
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Perth, Australia
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:18 am |
|
|
A simpler way would be to have the intrusion detect switch being a "make on release". This powers the PIC from a small CRxxx battery. The first thing the PIC does on power up is detect if it has been powered up via the intrusion switch operation (as opposed to a normal power up) in which case it will turn on a FET in parallel to the switch to keep power to the PIC while it performs some housekeeping such as writing its alarm status to EEPROM, turns off the FET and goes to sleep. _________________ Regards, Andrew
http://www.brushelectronics.com/software
Home of Ethernet, SD card and Encrypted Serial Bootloaders for PICs!! |
|
|
SherpaDoug
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 1640 Location: Cape Cod Mass USA
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:41 am |
|
|
You could charge a supercap when you have power. When a panel is removed a magnetic reed switch (SPDT type) drains the supercap quickly. When the power returns the PIC checks the voltage on the supercap to see if it is still charged, then recharges it if required. The supercap only has to feed leakage current while the power is off. _________________ The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done. |
|
|
ALFA 705
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 9
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 10:13 am |
|
|
Probability, I'll use a power-cap. I think it can be a good choice.
I'll test it in short time.
Thank you !!
Regards.
ALFA 705 |
|
|
|