CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

PIC 16F877. Implementation of i2c master with interrupt.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Renato and Davide
Guest







PIC 16F877. Implementation of i2c master with interrupt.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2001 9:48 am     Reply with quote

Hello at everybody,
we have wrote this code:

#USE I2C(master, sda=PIN_C4, scl=PIN_C3, SLOW, NOFORCE_SW)

int i=0;

void main ()
{
i2c_start ();
}

#INT_SSP
void master()
{
i2c_write (buffer[i]); //buffer[0] = 0x0E (slave address)
if (i==21) i2c_stop ();
i++;
}

* The problem is that the instruction i2c_start() in main provokes an interrupt, but the i2c_write () doesn't cause interrupt, is it correct ? If it is correct what is the usefullness?

* We have seen that the i2c_write () returns 0 (ACK) when the slave address is correct, but this not cause new interrupt.

* We had test that if the instruction i2c_write is located in main it cause the interrupt:

void main ()
{
i2c_start (); //cause the interrupt
i2c_write (); //cause the interrupt
}

We do not understand the usefullness.

IDE Version = 2.32
PCB Version = 3.043
PCM Version = 3.043
Thank you for the support. Best regards
___________________________
This message was ported from CCS's old forum
Original Post ID: 1352
Tomi
Guest







Re: PIC 16F877. Implementation of i2c master with interrupt.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2001 11:51 am     Reply with quote

Bon giorno,
the i2c_write() function includes a wait state after moving the byte into SSPBUF (it waits for the end of the write cycle).
Try this instead of "i2c_write(buffer[i])" line:

bit_set(*0x14,4); // optional:the clock polarity instruction if it is necessary
*0x13 = buffer[i]; // direct write into SSPBUF

:=Hello at everybody,
:=we have wrote this code:
:=
:=#USE I2C(master, sda=PIN_C4, scl=PIN_C3, SLOW, NOFORCE_SW)
:=
:=int i=0;
:=
:=void main ()
:={
:= i2c_start ();
:=}
:=
:=#INT_SSP
:=void master()
:={
:= i2c_write (buffer[i]); //buffer[0] = 0x0E (slave address)
:= if (i==21) i2c_stop ();
:= i++;
:=}
:=
:=* The problem is that the instruction i2c_start() in main provokes an interrupt, but the i2c_write () doesn't cause interrupt, is it correct ? If it is correct what is the usefullness?
:=
:=* We have seen that the i2c_write () returns 0 (ACK) when the slave address is correct, but this not cause new interrupt.
:=
:=* We had test that if the instruction i2c_write is located in main it cause the interrupt:
:=
:=void main ()
:={
:= i2c_start (); //cause the interrupt
:= i2c_write (); //cause the interrupt
:=}
:=
:=We do not understand the usefullness.
:=
:=IDE Version = 2.32
:=PCB Version = 3.043
:=PCM Version = 3.043
:=Thank you for the support. Best regards
___________________________
This message was ported from CCS's old forum
Original Post ID: 1356
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group