CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

i2c master hanging

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
alexbilo



Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Location: Trois-Rivières

View user's profile Send private message

i2c master hanging
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:41 am     Reply with quote

Hi,

I implemented an i2c master using the hardware ssp module. Here are my settings :

Code:

#use delay(clock=40000000,RESTART_WDT)
#fuses H4,NOWDT,WDT128,PUT,BROWNOUT,BORV27,NOWRT,NOLVP,DEBUG
#use i2c(MASTER,SDA=PIN_C4,SCL=PIN_C3,FAST,RESTART_WDT,FORCE_HW)


* Notice that I use an ICD2 debugger so I set the DEBUG fuse.

I found that the processor hangs from time to time in the i2c_write() routine while checking the SSPIF flag (to know then the transmission is finished, I assume)

Code:

0546:  BCF    FC6.7
0548:  BCF    F9E.3
054A:  MOVFF  42,FC9
054E:  MOVLW  02
0550:  BTFSC  FC6.7
0552:  GOTO   0562
**0556:  BTFSS  F9E.3
  0558:  GOTO   0556**
055C:  MOVLW  00
055E:  BTFSC  FC5.6
0560:  MOVLW  01
0562:  MOVWF  01
0564:  RETLW  00


The instructions between the stars executed in an infinite loop, as if the SSPIF flag is never set.

Any ideas about what can cause this?

Thanks,
_________________
Alex
rnielsen



Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 852
Location: Utah

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:50 am     Reply with quote

Hmmm, I'd like to help but my ASM language knowledge is in the toilet. If you posted your 'C' code along with it I might could add my 2 cents worth. Wink

Ronald
alexbilo



Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Location: Trois-Rivières

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:18 pm     Reply with quote

Sorry about the ASM listing, I just posted this snippet because this is the code for the i2c_write() function. Since this is a built-in function, I cannot access the C code (not even sure there IS C code for these functions).

I can at least tell you that the instructions between the stars probe the SSPIF bit (PIR1, bit3) and it loops until this bit gets set. My problem is exactly the fact that this bit is never set, leading to an infinite loop.

Hope this will help!

Thanks again,
_________________
Alex
Trampas



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 89
Location: NC

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:21 pm     Reply with quote

Big question! What version of compiler are you running?

I know that the 3.19x or maybe it was 3.201 or something had a bug with the I2C write function that took me several hours to figure out.

Basically I find the I spend 80% of my time tracking down my bugs and about 20% trying to figure out if the bug is mine or the compilers...

Trampas
alexbilo



Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Location: Trois-Rivières

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:44 pm     Reply with quote

Actually I use v.3.187... Hope this isn't a compiler bug Shocked

From the ASM listing and the ICD2 debugger I can see that the problem is this SSPIF that never gets set...

But does this result from a bad configuration from the compiler or a bad i2c_write() condition that prohibit this bit from being set, I don't know.
_________________
Alex
rnielsen



Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 852
Location: Utah

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:59 pm     Reply with quote

Could you post your entire I2C routine? This will really help to see where the problem might be.
Trampas



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 89
Location: NC

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 4:12 pm     Reply with quote

OK I know the bug was fixed in 3.191. Here is the code listing for a 16F872

Code:

....................       i2c_write(ptr[index++]); 
0078:  MOVF   5E,W
0079:  INCF   5E,F
007A:  ADDWF  63,W
007B:  MOVWF  04
007C:  MOVF   00,W
007D:  MOVWF  66
007E:  MOVF   66,W
007F:  MOVWF  13
0080:  BSF    14.4
0081:  BCF    0C.3
0082:  BSF    03.5
0083:  BTFSS  14.0
0084:  GOTO   087
0085:  BCF    03.5
0086:  GOTO   082

Note the spin is on register 14.0 which is the SSPCON SSPM0...

I really think this was a problem with the compiler! I know I worked for hours on the same problem. I know I share in your frustration because you have spent hours on the problem.

OK I have found that the problem existed in 3.206 here is the same code, compiled with 3.206:

.................... i2c_write(ptr[index++]);
0077: MOVF 5E,W
0078: INCF 5E,F
0079: ADDWF 63,W
007A: MOVWF 04
007B: MOVF 00,W
007C: MOVWF 66
007D: MOVF 66,W
007E: MOVWF 13
007F: BSF 14.4
0080: BCF 0C.3
0081: BTFSS 0C.3
0082: GOTO 081

The 3.206 code was checking the interrupt flag, while the 3.191 code checked the correct register. Note that this problem was reported back on July 30th.

I think what is happening is CCS may have had the bug in the version you are using, then fixed it for 3.191, then reintroduced it for 3.207.

I can here you cursing from here....

Trampas
Mark



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 2838
Location: Atlanta, GA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 4:45 pm     Reply with quote

No bigger, forget the CCS function and write you own. That way you will know it will work now and forever.
Trampas



Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 89
Location: NC

View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:12 pm     Reply with quote

Mark,

Razz I can not resist... But you are assuming the compiler does the right thing...

For example I have been using the bit_test() function. Yes I know it is a bad thing and I should write my own bit_test... But in 3.206

bit_test(CMCON,6) checked bit zero...

So you have to be careful when you write your own functions as well.

Trampas
Mark



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 2838
Location: Atlanta, GA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 6:48 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:
But you are assuming the compiler does the right thing


No way! I assume that it is not doing the right thing. That is why I write my own functions. Yep, even a bit test ;) I have taken the Microchip approach and defined the PIC registers and structs as well. That makes bit checking very easy.
Guest








PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:10 pm     Reply with quote

That is assuming the compiler compiles your code correctly. For example if you do a bit shift does it produce the correct assembly?

Trampas
alexbilo



Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 39
Location: Trois-Rivières

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:31 pm     Reply with quote

I must admit that this looks like a compiler bug. Anyway I'll make sure by replacing this routine by my own (which, of course, cannot be wrong... Rolling Eyes ...). I hope that, as Trampas pointed, I can at least rely on the built-in bit manipulation functions!

I'll let you know...

Thanks a lot!
_________________
Alex
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group