CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

IMU - PID some question
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

IMU - PID some question
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:35 am     Reply with quote

Hi friends,

-->I have some questions about IMU integrating with PID.
-->What is target and current ? How to associate with Kalman X,Y outputs to PID ?
-->Where is the deltaT in updatePid that is necessary to find integral and derivative ?
-->
-->deltaT that I used for gyroscope, can I use it for PID derivative and integral operation ? İf I cant, how to find deltaT for PID ?

-->Could you give me more detailed information ?

Thanks in advance

Giving Gyro values codes:
Code:

if (abs(deltaR[j]) > Rth[j])
      {
            gyroRate[j] = deltaR[j] * 0.07 * deltaT;
      }

PID controller:
Code:

int updatePid(int command, int targetValue, int currentValue)   
{     
float pidTerm = 0;                           
int error=0;                                 
static int last_error=0;                             
 error = abs(targetValue) - abs(currentValue);
 pidTerm = (Kp * error) + (Kd * (error - last_error));                           
 last_error = error;
 return constrain(command + int(pidTerm), 0, 255);
}
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9162
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:49 am     Reply with quote

First item is WHAT hardware ? You need to post mfr/make/model into of both PIC and IMU devices.

The BIG issue I have is whether the sensor is analog or digital. That makes a BIG difference as I've made/used analog gyros for 25 years.

The 'code' you show appears to be just a PD controller, not PID.

You'd also have to show us expected range of the plant, again my analog units go +-5 volts...


Jay
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:59 am     Reply with quote

I'm using pic18f4550 and IMU(L3G4200D & ADXL345).
20Mhz operation.

I have got information on this website:
http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?topic=8652.0

I have not much information about PID. I'm researching new. I learned PID in the automatic control course but not enough, not as code.
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19328

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 8:59 am     Reply with quote

DeltaT, is just 'the change in time'. You can choose whatever units you want for it. All the factors for a PIC (the integral, differential etc.), _depend_ on your hardware. That includes what you decide to use as the unit for deltaT.

The point is that everything that happens, you measure over an interval. This is the deltaT. The larger your deltaT unit, the bigger the integral figure will be etc.. You decide in your code (based on your knowledge - which you have to calculate), of how quickly the code can actually run.
Now the shorter the deltaT, the quicker the code can react to errors. However conversely, if the interval is too short, there will be increased 'granularity' in the measurements, especially at low speed. So if (for instance) you had a system that measures the speed of a shaft based on just one pulse per rev, if the shaft was only doing 1000rpm, and you used a deltaT of 1mSec, there would often be no actual 'speed' figure available, since there hasn't been time to make a new measurement.

Getting a PID setup well is a matter of working out the capabilities of each part of the system, combining this with what you actually need to achieve, and then the capabilities of the sensors. These then are the inputs that you use the calculate the correction factors for the PID algorithm. If the motor can be allowed to respond slowly, no 'P' term at all is needed. The faster you need to respond, the bigger the P term. Long term error is handled by the I term, and overshoot can then be controlled by the D term. To actually calculate a good set of factors requires complete data - the inertia of the components, torque capabilities etc.. Since these vary, it is common to simplify and only calculate a P term, and I term, and then have the system auto adjust the 'D' if it overshoots or takes too long to correct.
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9162
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:31 am     Reply with quote

First you need to get the basic hardware 'up and running'
That's a 5 volt PIC and those are 3 volt peripherals....
You'll NEED to make some changes to get basic hardware working....

1) read the 'electrical specs' of the 4550, chapter 28 I think, look a the charts...

2) read the specs for the peripherals, unless they are on some kind of 5 volt interface, you can't just 'connect/code/compile'.... this presumes you'll use the onboard I2C interface....

Jay
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:03 am     Reply with quote

temtronic codes already works no problem, also Ttelmah I couldn't understand enough your writing. Now how can I get deltaT? I cant give random this value. Am I wrong? This is sampling frequency, right?
and actually for example normally deltaX = deltaX + gyroValue * 0.07 * 1/800(sampling frequency)
1/800 is datasheet information but I get this value little calculation like you see and now this is sampling frequency (0.03) in this case now is this value is my deltaT, right? I'm confused.
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:15 am     Reply with quote

If I want to get a derivative of the central difference, I need the parameter h is this h now deltaT?

df0/dt = (-3f0 +4f1 -f2)/2h
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9162
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:20 am     Reply with quote

Please supply the make/model of the IMU ( a 'link' ) that you've got working with the 4550.
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:34 am     Reply with quote

https://www.direnc.net/arama?q=l3G4200D
https://www.direnc.net/arama?q=adxl345
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19328

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 3:01 am     Reply with quote

If you have two positions, then 'velocity', is the distance between these two points, over the time between the measurements. This time is the 'deltaT'.

So the equation for velocity in X, is :

(positionX1 - positionX2)/deltaT. so m/sec, or um/uSec etc.

Similarly 'acceleration' is the rate of change of velocity. So again the difference between two velocities over the time between the measurements.

deltaT, is just a way of saying 'difference between two measurement times'.

Units are down to you and your maths. So (for instance), it is much easier in most cases, to use something like a 1uSec 'tick' and then 'deltaT', can just be in integer uSeconds.

Now you need to choose your maths units to suit your hardware, and all the sensors being used. In a PID formula, you can adjust the factors used in the final equations, to suit the units you are using. So you sit down and think 'if I work in um and uSec, then all my values can be integer, which makes the maths much easier'. This is down to you choosing your units and designing your maths.
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 3:26 am     Reply with quote

When my reading is finished, I can take the value in the timer and see how many times it passes, right ?
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 7:51 am     Reply with quote

As Wikipedia codes PID:
Code:
previous_error = 0
integral = 0
start:
  error = setpoint - measured_value
  integral = integral + error*dt
  derivative = (error - previous_error)/dt
  output = Kp*error + Ki*integral + Kd*derivative
  previous_error = error
  wait(dt)
  goto start

dt is sampling time, If I do this, am I right?
--> I write all the codes into the loop for operation. (İncluding Gyro_Values();)
--> Like you know is including dt in Gyro_Values();
--> Just printing gyroRate[j] on LCD at 90 degree
Code:

for (int j = 0; j<3; j++)
   {
      deltaR[j] = (float32)Rm[j] - Ro[j];
     
      if (abs(deltaR[j]) > Rth[j])
      {
            gyroRate[j] = gyroRate[j] + deltaR[j] * 0.07;
      }
   }

--> and I get a value that I solve simple equation and find a scale-factor(dt(deltaT)).
--> Finally my new code include is this gyroRate[j] = gyroRate[j] + deltaR[j] * 0.07 * deltaT;
--> Why deltaT this value because Datasheet say this.
--> Now with this deltaT my Gyroscope works good and Kalman, too.
--> This means I can use this value with PID ?????
--> Last one, it is not necessary to use Wait(dt) in PID codes because program process already will wait because already I used this waiting to get deltaT.
Now am I right?
newguy



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 1903

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 10:11 am     Reply with quote

Google "PID Without A PhD" by Tim Wescott.
Zek_De



Joined: 13 Aug 2016
Posts: 100

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:49 pm     Reply with quote

Could you tell me how to get the data from the motor with encoder, no code, I need to sentences, what should I do, actually little like I know, but I need exact information.
Also why does the program work when I didn't use deltaT ? I couldn't understand exactly.
Quote:
Note: In practice, when we use this in PID control, we will skip dividing by 20 [ms] because we don't care about the exact value of velocity and we will always be multiplying the velocity by some constant (think of the divide by 20 as part of the constant)


http://team3161.ca/resources/external/Introduction_to_PID_Control.pdf

İf I determine to deltaT, don't I have to use PID without PhD ? Also this _PID without PhD_ cause error accumulation for integral, dependent wrong deltaT (about system velocity).
newguy



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 1903

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:20 pm     Reply with quote

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pid+without+a+phd+tim+wescott
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group