CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

Which in-circuit programmer is good ?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
arunb



Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 492
Location: India

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Which in-circuit programmer is good ?
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:23 am     Reply with quote

Hi,

Which in-circuit programmer is better, ICDU64 or pickit 3..???

thanks
arunb
dyeatman



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 1924
Location: Norman, OK

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:19 am     Reply with quote

I don't have the ICDU64 but I have been using the ICDU40 for a number of years and it has worked great for me...
_________________
Google and Forum Search are some of your best tools!!!!
mkuang



Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 257

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:12 am     Reply with quote

I use the MPLAD ICD2. I have no basis for comparison.
Guest








PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:56 am     Reply with quote

I use PicKit2 for programming only and i happy for it:-)
bkamen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 1611
Location: Central Illinois, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:49 pm     Reply with quote

I've had:

The PICstart Plus -- not exactly designed for ICSP but it works!
PICkit2 -- (gah!) Don't get me started. Mediocre MPLAB support in the past.
ICD2 -- Rock and Roll!
ICD3 -- Newer and better. I still don't use all the neato features.

I'm very happy with the ICD's.
_________________
Dazed and confused? I don't think so. Just "plain lost" will do. :D
arunb



Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 492
Location: India

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

RE:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:32 pm     Reply with quote

Thank you all for the reply.

I examined both ICDU64 (ICDU40 is not available) and PICKit3. They both are similar in many ways.

PICKit3 needs a 6 pin connector on each target board, this could be expensive. Is it possible to solder the ICSP terminals to the target board for programming ??.

ICDU64 is equally good, but with the TagConnect extension, I could eliminate connectors. But the cost of the system would be 105 USD..

How is the TagConnect extension cable is it useful ??? Does the cable degrade after a period of usage...??

Also is the ICDU64 bug prone ???

thanks
arunb
bkamen



Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 1611
Location: Central Illinois, USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:48 pm     Reply with quote

Actually, most ICSP setups only need 5 pins.

I typically only use 5 on my systems with full debug.

I design a header on the board and just leave it empty.

On the bench for Development, I use a soldered in header.

When I go to program the board, I just hand hold the programming cable in place.

A pod with Pogo Test pins could also be used.

I've also designed 6p6c modular connectors onto boards for people.

Cheers,

-ben
_________________
Dazed and confused? I don't think so. Just "plain lost" will do. :D
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group