CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

Fast_io not working properly on 16F887

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wohn
Guest







Fast_io not working properly on 16F887
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:50 pm     Reply with quote

While using fast_io(C) on the 16F887, portc will float the outputs when I try to float 1 pin. All other ports function properly. Let me know if Im doing something wrong or not. Thanks
Code:
#include "16f887.h"         
#use delay (clock=4MHz)         
#use fast_io(A)   
#use fast_io(B)
#use fast_io(C)
#use fast_io(D)
#use fast_io(E)

#fuses INTRC_IO,NOWDT,PUT,NOMCLR,NOPROTECT,NOCPD,NOBROWNOUT,NOIESO,NOFCMEN,NOLVP,NOWRT,BORV40

int RATIO=255;

void main()
{   
   set_tris_A(0xFF);               
   set_tris_B(0x00);
    set_tris_C(0x00);
   set_tris_D(0x00);   
   set_tris_E(0x08);            
   port_B_pullups(0xFF);

   output_C(RATIO);

   delay_ms(1500);

   output_float(PIN_A4);
   output_float(PIN_C6);   
   output_float(PIN_E0);

   enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);

   sleep();
}

Im using pcw 4.057
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:43 pm     Reply with quote

Seems like a compiler bug but I don't understand all the details. What happens for the output_float command on PortC is that the compiler generates code like fast_io is not specified. This is related to an errata setting in chipedit.exe: 'Don't RMW on TRISC'.
Wrong here is that the compiler accepts the fast_io setting for most commands, except for output_float. This creates a corrupted shadow register. The problem also exists in v4.077 (my most recent version).

Possible work around:
- Use normal_io on portC

I don't understand what the chip errata is supposed to do, and I can't find this problem being mentioned in the PIC16F887 Silicon Errata sheet. Maybe someone else can comment on this?

Edit: removed second work around as it appears to be a bad idea.


Last edited by ckielstra on Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:51 pm     Reply with quote

The compiler maintains a shadow register for TRISC. It's initialized to
"all inputs" by the compiler in its start-up code. The problem is that the
set_tris_c() function doesn't update the shadow register when in #fast_io
mode. But other functions, such as output_float() do access the shadow
register. So they're using the initial value, which is "all inputs", when
it should properly be "all outputs", due to your changing the TRIS C
register with the set_tris_c(0) function. That's why you're seeing a
problem.

Because of this, I'm not sure you can use #fast_io mode on Port C.

I don't normally use #fast_io mode, so I'm not completely up-to-date on
all the machinations that the compiler does in that mode. But the quick
way to fix your problem is just to eliminate #fast_io mode for Port C.
Leave it in standard i/o mode (which is the default).
Example:
Quote:
#use fast_io(A)
#use fast_io(B)
//#use fast_io(C)
#use fast_io(D)
#use fast_io(E)
Wohn
Guest







fast_io
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:12 pm     Reply with quote

I have not been using the fast_io on port c because of this and was
wondering what the problem was and if it was me or a bug. I was just
trying to cut down a few words off the program memory so its no big deal.
Thanks for clearing this up for me. Still alot I need to learn about the way
c gets compiled.
Thank You
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:17 pm     Reply with quote

ckielstra wrote:
I don't understand what the chip errata is supposed to do, and I can't find this problem being mentioned in the PIC16F887 Silicon Errata sheet. Maybe someone else can comment on this?
OK, found out why: searching this forum I found the following link: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.embedded.piclist/msg/e66622c7e2a2677e (Thanks PCM)
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:20 pm     Reply with quote

Hi ckielstra,
It's this paragraph from the 16F877 data sheet, in the I/O ports section
on Port C:
Quote:

When enabling peripheral functions, care should be
taken in defining TRIS bits for each PORTC pin. Some
peripherals override the TRIS bit to make a pin an output,
while other peripherals override the TRIS bit to
make a pin an input. Since the TRIS bit override is in
effect while the peripheral is enabled, read-modify-write
instructions (BSF, BCF, XORWF) with TRISC as
destination, should be avoided. The user should refer
to the corresponding peripheral section for the correct
TRIS bit settings.

CCS fixes this problem by doing all modifications to a shadow register
for TRISC, and then when ready, they write the shadow register as a
complete byte to the TRISC register. They never read the physical
TRISC register. They only write to it.
FvM



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 2337
Location: Germany

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:28 pm     Reply with quote

I found these erratas related to TRIS read-modify-write.

The first is related to SPI slave mode, affecting only a few old PIC16 devices, the others to I2C slave mode and is valid for many PIC16 and PIC18 types, including also 16F877:
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/80048c.pdf
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/80131e.pdf
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/80132f.pdf
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:15 pm     Reply with quote

PCM and FvM, thanks for the extra info!

FvM: the second document you refer to I have never seen before. Seems like I2C on many chips has a problem that we often overlook in this forum.
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:43 am     Reply with quote

I'd say that really I'm not surprised that 'output_float', would have problems with fast_io.
If you simply say that when 'fast_io' is used, it becomes _your_responsibility to control TRIS then it becomes 'not surprising' that there may be problems. It works on most chips, since TRIS can be read and written normally, but not on the 877, because of the need to use the shadow register. If you want to do this, then go fully 'DIY'. Something like:
Code:

int8 tris_val;
#define set_trisC(x) tris_val=x;set_tris_c(x)
#define my_float(pin) if((pin & 0xF8)==0x38) \
{bit_set(tris_val,pin&7);set_tris_c(tris_val)} \
else output_float(pin)

No guarantees!...

Best Wishes
FvM



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 2337
Location: Germany

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:26 am     Reply with quote

If the linked errata sheet information is complete, TRISC read-modify-write must not be disabled, except for designs using I2C slaves. I didn't check, but would give it a try.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group