![](templates/subSilver/images/CCSLogo.jpg) |
![CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers](templates/subSilver/images/forumAd6.jpg) |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
dsPIC and PCD question |
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:03 pm |
|
|
I've just gotten my project to a proof of concept stage, using a PIC18F25j10, but could use alot more memory, as well as make things run alot faster.
There is plenty of room for optimization of my code, but I'm also starting to think that a dsPIC might better suit my needs. Reading the posts I've found about PCD and all of the bugs, I get the feeling that its definitely not as polished and stable as PCH.
Are there certain chips that are more stable than others? Can anyone recommend one over another on the basis of compiler stability alone? |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
FvM
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 2337 Location: Germany
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:01 am |
|
|
Hello,
I aggree with not as polished. Not stable isn't probably the right term. The compiler obviously has some bugs, the chips are performing fine, as far as I could check. And I expect that the code is running stable when you have managed to tell the compiler your intentions and avoided some existing traps. Most current PCD limitations are related to the dsPIC/24x 16-Bit device family in general, I think, some to specific chips. I'm generally missing a list of supported/unsupported features, or did I overlook something?
Regards,
Frank |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|