|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JAM2014
Joined: 24 Apr 2014 Posts: 138
|
Connecting multiple PIC MCU's |
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:56 pm |
|
|
Hi All,
I'm updating the design of some test equipment, and I need to be able to pass 8 bytes of data to a 'Master' from up to four 'Slaves'. Data rate can be quite slow (19,200 baud or so). I'm envisioning a daisy chain type interconnect cable for the physical wiring connection. Each instrument can be up to 5 feet distant, so the maximum distance from the Master to the farthest Slave is 15 feet. I considered RS485, but I'm not sure how I'd handle the buss termination when I'm never sure where the 'end of the line' is based on the number of connected instruments. I suppose I could specify that the end connector always be used, but I want to make this totally idiot proof!
I've never used I2C for this type of communication. The specs. look promising. Is I2C a viable option for this type of thing?
What about SPI?
So, looking for suggestions on the method/protocol that will provide a simple, yet robust inter-board communications for up to four boards each spaced 5 feet apart.
Thanks,
Jack |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9226 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:22 pm |
|
|
Given the choices, go with RS-485. Easily handles the distance/speed criteria. CCS has a 'driver/example' program you can start with. Easy to add more 'slaves'.
If the slaves will be powered from the Master, then RJ-45/CAT5 makes great connection/cabling. Cheap, quick install,reliable. if you deign the I/O of the slaves with 'in' and 'out' connectors on opposite side, the 'termination' goes in the last slaves 'out' connector. When you need to add #6, remove term plug form #5, add cable, #6, then install 'term plug' into #6 'out'. Easy and simple.
BTW ...19K200 isn't 'slow' to me, it's 800X faster than my energy systems run.
Both I2C and SPI are 'board level', not designed for distance, more for speed (which you don't need). |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19511
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:57 am |
|
|
Absolutely.
If you want to take I2C, more than about 5 feet, you start having to
use extra transceivers and a higher signalling voltage. Otherwise reliability
plummets. More complex than RS485.
I'd suggect you just make the boards each have an in and out connector.
Then have a plug with a terminating resistor that you plug into the end
unused 'out' connector.
There are two parts to termination. The signal reflection, and the bus
biasing. Just have biasing in the master board. Then the reflection is
down to simply having a resistor between the two signals that is close
to the characteristic impedance of the cable, at each end of the bus.
So for perhaps a 100R cable use resistors between perhaps 100R and 120R.
Both SPI, and I2C, are designed as local busses only. They are not
suitable in any way for communicating more than a few inches really. |
|
|
bkamen
Joined: 07 Jan 2004 Posts: 1615 Location: Central Illinois, USA
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|