|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rfjhh
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 51 Location: Mexico
|
I2C master with multiple slaves |
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 9:18 am |
|
|
I'm designing a project with a master and 10 or more slaves using I2C protocol. The communication with a single slave works well. But when I begin to connect the second slave, the program desn't work. I found a discussion for a similar problem, but nothing helpful for me .
The codes are as follows:
For Slaves, the code is the same, just the address changes.
MASTER
Code: |
#include <16f887.h>
#fuses NOWDT, INTRC_IO, NOPROTECT, NODEBUG, BROWNOUT, NOLVP, CPD, NOWRT, PUT
#use delay(clock=8MHz)
#use i2c(Master, fast, sda=PIN_C4,scl=PIN_C3)
#include <lcd.c>
#use fast_io(A)
#use fast_io(B)
#use fast_io(E)
int8 leer_i2c(int8 dir_esc)
{
int8 dato=0;
i2c_start (); //Inicio comunicacion
delay_us(100);
i2c_write (dir_esc); //Direccion del esclavo
delay_us(100);
dato = i2c_read(0); //Leemos en la direccion apuntada anteriormente
delay_us(100);
i2c_stop (); //Fin de la comunicacion
return(dato);
}
void main()
{
int8 valor1, valor2;
set_tris_a(0xff);
set_tris_e(0xfe);
lcd_init();
lcd_gotoxy(1,1);
printf(lcd_putc, "I2C");
for(;;)
{
lcd_gotoxy(1,2);
printf(lcd_putc, "Valor = ");
valor1 = leer_i2c(0x11); // 0x10|1 => 0001000 1
lcd_gotoxy(9,2);
printf(lcd_putc, "%3u", valor1);
delay_ms(50);
valor2 = leer_i2c(0x13); // 0x12|1 => 0001001 1
lcd_gotoxy(13,2);
printf(lcd_putc, "%3u", valor2);
delay_ms(500);
}
}
|
SLAVES
Code: |
#include <16f886.h>
#fuses NOWDT, INTRC_IO, NOPROTECT, NODEBUG, BROWNOUT, NOLVP, CPD, NOWRT, PUT
#use delay(clock=8MHz)
#use i2c(SLAVE, fast=100000, sda=PIN_C4, scl=PIN_C3, address=0x12, FORCE_HW) // for slave 2, for slave 1 address = 0x10
#use fast_io(A)
#use fast_io(B)
int8 state, Direc_master, dato;
#int_SSP
void SSP_isr(void)
{
dato = input_b();
state = i2c_isr_state();
if(state == 0x80) // Maestro espera datos
{
output_high(PIN_A0); // just for tensting
delay_ms(200);
output_low(PIN_A0);
delay_ms(200);
i2c_write(dato);
}
}
void main()
{
set_tris_b(0xff);
set_tris_a(0xf0);
enable_interrupts(INT_SSP);
enable_interrupts(global);
output_a(0x00);
while(1)
{}
}
|
Another remark: When I work with a single slave connected to the bus, the communication works well, but if I connect the second slave to the bus (even if I don't perform a read in the master) the system doesn't work.
I included a blinking signal in RA0 to test the entrance to interrupt routine.
Thanks for your help. |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9229 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:01 am |
|
|
quick answer...
First, I would load PCM P's 'I2C Scanner' found in the Code Library and confirm your hardware setup is correct. Depending on number of slaves, distance and wiring you'll need to select the correct I2C pullup resistors.
If his program does see all of the slaves, then it's down to your code. Having delays of any kind within an ISR is very, very bad to do. ISRs need to be short and fast, simply set a 'flag' and have main() do the required action.
Jay |
|
|
rfjhh
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 51 Location: Mexico
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:15 pm |
|
|
At this moment I'm working with Proteus before to do it physically. |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19520
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 1:17 pm |
|
|
Totally pointless.
Proetus's PIC simulator has lots of problems. You can have designs it'll say will work, that won't in the real world, and designs that do work in the real world, that it says won't. So you can spend ages using this to test PIC code, and then have to do it all again when you get to the real chip....
Some comments:
Your PIC is on address 0x12 for write, and 0x13 for read. Yet you have one of your routines talking to address 0x11.
A slave does not have a speed.
The slave for state 0x80, needs to read the received byte, holding the ACK low, and then load the byte to write.
Code: | I2c_read(2); //hold ACK
I2c_write(byte_to_send); |
It must always read when a byte is sent, or the hardware can become locked. |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9229 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:12 pm |
|
|
re:
Quote: | ... I'm working with Proteus .... |
hahaha..
From my encounters with Proteus (and those shown here...), it should be tossed into the 'trash bin' and 'scrubbed' from any serious programmer's PC. There aren't enough hours in the day or space in this forum to say WHY it's a waste of time. It's the 'silly' details it doesn't deal with, like xtal and caps......., wrong voltages, no power supply connections, sigh....
Jay |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|