![](templates/subSilver/images/CCSLogo.jpg) |
![CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers](templates/subSilver/images/forumAd6.jpg) |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nilsener
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Posts: 59
|
18F2523 and PWM with CCP2 Module |
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:31 am |
|
|
18F2523
PCWH 4.014
Dear,
I have a PWM signal at CCP1 Pin (RC2) that is running very well. To set the PWM, I use:
Code: |
setup_timer_2(T2_DIV_BY_4, 255, 1);
setup_ccp1(CCP_PWM);
set_pwm1_duty(value);
|
Now I want to add an other PWM (with same frequency) on CCP2 Pin (RC1) but it fails. I want to use:
Code: |
setup_ccp2(CCP_PWM);
set_pwm2_duty(value);
|
but the compiler says "Undefined identifier set_pwm2_duty" and "Undefined identifier setup_ccp2".
Somebody with an idea how to activate PWM at CCP2 pin?
Thanks for any help
Nilsener |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19359
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:09 am |
|
|
I'd have to say 'get a new compiler'.
4.014, was when V4, was still beta at best. It was something like 4.050 before it started to work even remotely 'right'.
I kept 3.249, then the next one I felt worth retaining was in the high .060's for V4...
For many months, there was a 'sticky' at the top of this forum as people tried the new releases, and found successive problems. |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:27 pm |
|
|
Here's a work-around if you don't want to upgrade. You should upgrade
because 4.014 isn't a great version, but if you don't want to, this will help.
Since setup_ccp2() and set_pwm2_duty() don't exist in vs. 4.014 for
the 18F2523, I just copied the ASM code and put it in a macro wrapper.
I included the feature of 8/10-bit pwm selection by checking the size of the
input parameter in the macro.
There is demo code to ramp the PWM duty cycle from 0 to 100% for both
8 and 10 bit modes. I didn't have an 18F2523 to test it, so I used an
18F4431 which is in the same family. It works. I did test it with vs. 4.014.
My goal was to get ASM code that looked the same as the CCS library
code. The demo shows PWM channels 1 and 2 so you can compare the
library code PWM (used on ch 1) to the macro code on ch 2. They produce
identical waveforms.
Code: |
#include <18F2523.h>
#fuses INTRC_IO, BROWNOUT, PUT, NOWDT
#use delay(clock=4M)
//----------------------------
// This macro creates the set_pwm2_duty() function
// which doesn't exist in vs. 4.014 for the 18F2523.
#byte CCPR2L = 0xFBB
#byte CCPR2H = 0xFBC
#byte CCP2CON = 0xFBA
int16 duty;
int8 temp;
#define BYTE_PTR(x) &(int8 *)(x)
#define set_pwm2_duty(value) \
duty = value; \
if(sizeof(value) == 1) \
CCPR2L = duty; \
else \
{ \
#asm \
RRCF BYTE_PTR(duty)+1,F \
RRCF duty,F \
RRCF BYTE_PTR(duty)+1,F \
RRCF duty,F \
RRCF BYTE_PTR(duty)+1,F \
MOVFF 01,CCPR2L \
RRCF BYTE_PTR(duty)+1,F \
RRCF BYTE_PTR(duty)+1,W \
ANDLW 30 \
MOVWF temp \
MOVF CCP2CON,W \
ANDLW 0xCF \
IORWF temp,W \
MOVWF CCP2CON \
#endasm \
}
//----------------------------------------------------
// This macro creates the setup_ccp2() function which
// doesn't exist in vs. 4.014 for the 18F2523.
#define setup_ccp2(mode) \
output_low(PIN_C1); \
CCP2CON = mode
//===================================
void main()
{
int8 duty8;
int16 duty16;
int16 i;
// Back off the PR2 value to 254 so we can get 100% duty cycle.
setup_timer_2(T2_DIV_BY_4, 254, 1);
setup_ccp1(CCP_PWM);
setup_ccp2(CCP_PWM);
// Ramp the duty cycle from 0 to 100% for 10-bit and 8-bit pwm.
// 10-bit pwm
for(i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
{
duty16 = i;
set_pwm1_duty(duty16);
set_pwm2_duty(duty16);
delay_ms(10);
}
delay_ms(5000);
// 8-bit pwm
for(i=0; i < 256; i++)
{
duty8 = (int8)i;
set_pwm1_duty(duty8);
set_pwm2_duty(duty8);
delay_ms(50);
}
while(1);
} |
|
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|