View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hmmpic
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Posts: 314 Location: Denmark
|
[Off Topic] 38khz 1,6w in a 0805 resistor? |
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:10 pm |
|
|
Hi
I know off topic.
The Peak load on the resistor is about 3,6v and 0,44 amp = 1,6w.
Duty 50% Temp in the box max25c.
It is a 0805 resistor pulsed with 38khz in 150ms, with 1 second pause between next burst. There are NO heat at all, I have stressed it to run 1 day without problem. Normally it will only fire once or two for a day.
Will it be overkill to go in production with it?
Last edited by hmmpic on Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:59 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19504
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:49 pm |
|
|
It depends totally on the environment.
Is the unit going to be boxed?. How hot is it likely to get inside the box?. Ambient temperature?.
It is not clear whether your .44A, is peak, or the average during the 38KHz pulse, and what the duty cycle of this is. If it is the peak, and the pulse is a square wave, the average during the pulse is only 0.8W. The average power then becomes (0.15/1.15) * 0.8, which is almost exactly 0.1W.
The rate of heat rise during the pulse, will depend on the board it is attached to, as well as the resistor itself. Most resistor manufacturers will also have a pulse rating, and you need to check you are inside this. I'd possibly suggest that for the very low extra cost involved, it'd be worth specifying a resistor with a high/known 'pulse rating'. For example, in the UK:
<www.welwyn-tt.com/pdf/application_notes/pwc_appnotes.pdf>
These are _rated_ to handle 0.9W pulses at 150mSec duration, so you can then have confidence.
Best Wishes |
|
|
asmallri
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Re: [Off Topic] 38khz 1,6w in a 0805 resistor? |
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:04 pm |
|
|
hmmpic wrote: | Hi
I know off topic.
The load on the resistor is about 3,6v and 0,44 amp = 1,6w.
It is a 0805 resistor pulsed with 38khz in 150ms, with 1 second pause between next burst. There are NO heat at all, I have stressed it to run 1 day without problem. Normally it will only fire once or two for a day.
Will it be overkill to go in production with it? |
805 is the footprint. What is the wattage rating of the resistor in question? _________________ Regards, Andrew
http://www.brushelectronics.com/software
Home of Ethernet, SD card and Encrypted Serial Bootloaders for PICs!! |
|
|
newguy
Joined: 24 Jun 2004 Posts: 1907
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:10 pm |
|
|
More than 90% of the hardware-related weird behavior or outright failures I have to deal with on a daily basis are caused by design marginalities somewhat like your situation. Do yourself a favour and either opt for a resistor like the kind that Ttelmah recommended, or redesign the board to accept a higher power rated resistor.
As a side note, the people responsible for these designs at my workplace were fired long ago. For precisely this reason. There are good designs and there are "this should be good" designs. Don't become known for the latter. |
|
|
John P
Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Posts: 331
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:25 pm |
|
|
I assume this is part of an infrared light communication system as with TV remote controls.
Repeating Ttelmah's work on the topic:
You have 1.6W power dissipation while the current is flowing. But it only flows half the time, so the real power loss is 0.8W. Then it's operating at 150ms per second, so the duty cycle is 15%, which cuts the power loss down to 0.12W (assuming it heats up at an "average" rate).
Now an 0805 resistor is rated at .125W, so you're right at the top of its capability. But rather than dissipating power at that "average" rate, I would guess that a 1-second period imposes some significant heating and cooling each cycle, which probably adds to the stress level. This looks like a marginal selection. If I were your colleague on the design team, I'd be trying to get you to move up to a larger (physically) resistor. It really wouldn't add much size or cost to the product. |
|
|
asmboy
Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 2128 Location: albany ny
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:04 pm |
|
|
ask yourself:
do you know how to do linear integration?
FILM and most types of resistors are very good at averaging (RMSing) the total power as "area under the curve" so long as you don't exceed :
1- peak voltage rating
2- " current rating
3 and as Mr. Tt points out, most critically "dissipation in-situ"
out of habit i never spec a resistor that will dissipate more then 66% of its free air rating. 50% in power stages, near other heat producing parts.
the rest is just algebra
|
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19504
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:19 am |
|
|
Absolutely.
However 0.125W, is normally the rating for industrial temperature ranges. The same resistor can handle well over this for a reduced temperature range.
Hence the question about the environment. Separately though, a short high power pulse brings other problems (fatigue as the part expands/contracts etc.), so you can't just integrate under the power curve, and expect everything to work.
Provided the environment is relatively benign, the power rating is probably OK.
However I'd not trust a resistor that hasn't got a pulse rating to take this, to be reliable 'long term'.
Also remember that 'unexpected' places can sometimes be very hostile. Inside a car for example. Park it in the Sun, and suddenly you have 70C temperatures.....
Best Wishes |
|
|
Mike Walne
Joined: 19 Feb 2004 Posts: 1785 Location: Boston Spa UK
|
Re: [Off Topic] 38khz 1,6w in a 0805 resistor? |
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:50 am |
|
|
hmmpic wrote: | Hi
I know off topic.
The load on the resistor is about 3,6v and 0,44 amp = 1,6w.
It is a 0805 resistor pulsed with 38khz in 150ms, with 1 second pause between next burst. There are NO heat at all, I have stressed it to run 1 day without problem. Normally it will only fire once or two for a day.
Will it be overkill to go in production with it? |
The section in bold gives me little confidence in your design or ability to properly test it.
In my book there MUST be some heat dissipation and readily measurable temperature rise.
Take note of the splendid advice you've been given by others.
As an extra, and you want to be assured with your design:-
1) Run tests at higher power to see how much margin you've got.
2) Test with a variety of different resistor types, (including Melfs).
3) Make the best possible resistance measurement before and after each test.
Mike |
|
|
hmmpic
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Posts: 314 Location: Denmark
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 8:06 am |
|
|
Thanks for all the reply, it help a lot.
I have decided to use something like "@Ttelmah" suggested resistor. I dont know they exist, know I know it to another time. |
|
|
hmmpic
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Posts: 314 Location: Denmark
|
|
|
gpsmikey
Joined: 16 Nov 2010 Posts: 588 Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:15 pm |
|
|
A resistor pulsed beyond it's instantaneous limits (even if under the "average" specified) is often referred to as a "fuse" :-) I always stay clear of the rating when I can to avoid being the "common failure" a year down the road on 1000 boards in service.
mikey _________________ mikey
-- you can't have too many gadgets or too much disk space !
old engineering saying: 1+1 = 3 for sufficiently large values of 1 or small values of 3 |
|
|
FvM
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 2337 Location: Germany
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 10:37 am |
|
|
Quote: | A resistor pulsed beyond it's instantaneous limits (even if under the "average" specified) is often referred to as a "fuse" :-) |
Quite sure. The problem is with "instantaneous limits" which are often unspecified in the specific datasheets.
Some manufacturers, e.g. Vishay have additional application notes discussing pulse load.
The discussed load case of 0.12 W average load over 1 s and 0.8 W over 150 ms seems to be
within the permitted range of 0805 standard SMD resistors. |
|
|
|