|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
theteaman
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 98
|
Porting issue (initializing struct) |
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:42 am |
|
|
Hi
I am porting a program from x86 GCC to PIC CCS C. It has been a lot of work, for example, replacing all the recursive functions and ensuring the code is CCS compatible.
Now I am at a point where I could really use some help. The issue is that there is a very large data structure. It is a struct, with more structs inside.
On the x86 version of the program, the data structure is created at init time through a set of function calls that populate the data structure with constants. On the PIC, there is simply not enough RAM to do this.
Luckily, all the data going in to the structure is constant and known at compile time, so theoretically I should be able to store this data in program memory.
I've looked at the examples of storing data in program memory but it's really messy. I guess what I'm after is the ability to do something like this (global variables):
Code: |
struct b
{
int a;
};
struct a
{
int x;
struct b z;
};
const struct a data[100];
data[0].x = 1; //breaks here
data[0].z.a = 2; //breaks here
void main() {
...
|
However, it seems it's only possible to initialize the memory in one huge blob of code, like so:
Code: |
const struct a data[100] = {1, {2}}...
|
This would make the code difficult to read, write and maintain. Is it possible to initialize the struct as above?
Any help appreciated, thanks. |
|
|
RF_Developer
Joined: 07 Feb 2011 Posts: 839
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:47 am |
|
|
A const data items can only be initialised, and read, it cannot be assigned to. As they never changed, they can be placed in read-only memory, which in CCS C means program memory.
Your preferred initialisation is assigning values at run time: you cannot do this with const data. The "huge blob" is the correct, and only way of initialising const data.
This is basic C: const is const and cannot be changed. End of.
Yo uare suffering one of the consequences of porting code from a processor with vast memory resources to a very limited one. You cannot expect to simply copy the code over, you have to put in quite a lot of porting effor, which you seem to be able and willing to do, which is good.
RF Developer |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19529
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:58 am |
|
|
and remember a 'huge blob', can be split up in your source. If (for instance), you are intialising structures, then put each structure initialisation on a separate line with the '\' at the end of each line. You can even have comments after the '\' so the initialisation needn't be 'seen' as one big blob.....
Best Wishes |
|
|
theteaman
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 98
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:02 am |
|
|
Thanks both for your help. I guess the issue is the struct has structs (with more structs) inside it. It just gets too messy. But I think I can use macros to make things look neater.. I will try it. |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|