CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

How to find distance between two WSN nodes (for nRF24L01)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hikaan



Joined: 27 Jan 2012
Posts: 1

View user's profile Send private message

How to find distance between two WSN nodes (for nRF24L01)
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:24 pm     Reply with quote

Hi

I am using nrf24L01 transceiver in my WSN node. In this transceiver there is no support for RSSI. In this case, is there any method to find the distance between two WSN nodes ? Is there any scheme like TOF (Time of Flight) that will be useful or not ? Pls suggest your opinion.

Thanks
G Kannan
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9170
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 2:12 pm     Reply with quote

You probably will not get any responses with a solution( there are 3 that I know) unless you report which PIC type and compiler version you are using as well as application(home,office, school), accuracy of distance( 1ft, 1mm, ??),update rate(1 hr, 1 sec,1ms,??).
Eduardo__



Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Brazil

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:55 am     Reply with quote

Dear folks. I´m looking for the same solution. Do you know whether is possible to do this with RF? like an LPS(Local positioning system)?

My needs are:
application(home or school), accuracy of distance(1inch or less),update rate(100ms or better).

I was looking on ultrasound solutions as I cannot think nothing faster enough for reading a RF signal time of flight(should be faster enough for read differences of pico-seconds). Even GPS system uses atomic clocks and it have meters of precision.

Anyone have ideas?

Thanks a lot!!!!
_________________
Eduardo Guilherme Brandt
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9170
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:01 pm     Reply with quote

Several solutions all based upon specs and money you can afford for the project.
How much money will you spend ?
Simple GPS can give you 1" resolution at 1/10th second update rate.
Eduardo__



Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Brazil

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:40 pm     Reply with quote

But, how to achieve GPS 1" resolution?


Of course, despite of how much money we have, I would like to know your ideas, if possible.
Every solution must be as cheap as possible, but I know it´s not possible.

I cannot understand how GPS receivers can manage so tinny time differences. I know that pico or even nano-second times are problematic for uCs and even uPs. Do you know how this works on this problem?
_________________
Eduardo Guilherme Brandt
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9170
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:57 pm     Reply with quote

The basic solution involves using multiple GPS units per 'device'. Using 8 it is easy to get 1" resolution.
It's up to you to buy 8 identical GPSes,get all 8 talking to one PIC (faster is better) and do the code to figure out exactly where the device is.

It's not really 'rocket science' just looking at the problem from another 'angle'. When access to milsat gpses was blocked, using comsat gpses required 'outside the box' thinking.

You haven't given details as to the area or range the device has to be found in (room, house, 5 acres, 100 acres), line of sight or rough terrain, weather conditions, speed of target, etc. All are factors in a project like this.

If this is to be in say a 20 x 20' room, one level, simple LADAR will work, easily <1"
Eduardo__



Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Brazil

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:07 pm     Reply with quote

Dear Mr. Temtronic.
Thanks for sharing with us.

It´s a good Idea to buy 8 gps(it´s not expensive, U$30,00 each). But I not understood the principle of operation. Each of 8 gps will give me an approximation. What to do with each gps data(Latitude, longitude, height)? Make an average?

I´ve heard about DGPS system. DO you know how it exactly works?

About LADAR, are you talking of lasers?
_________________
Eduardo Guilherme Brandt
Eduardo__



Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Brazil

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:39 pm     Reply with quote

If I understood, LADAR seems to be a better system to see depth. To build a 3D from images.
_________________
Eduardo Guilherme Brandt
Eduardo__



Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Brazil

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:43 pm     Reply with quote

temtronic wrote:


It's not really 'rocket science' just looking at the problem from another 'angle'. When access to milsat gpses was blocked, using comsat gpses required 'outside the box' thinking.



What are MILSAT and COMSAT? I´ve not understood this part.
_________________
Eduardo Guilherme Brandt
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9170
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:51 pm     Reply with quote

MILSAT ( aka military GPS satellites)
COMSAT (aka commercial GPS satellites).
Eduardo__



Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 197
Location: Brazil

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:48 am     Reply with quote

temtronic wrote:
The basic solution involves using multiple GPS units per 'device'. Using 8 it is easy to get 1" resolution.
It's up to you to buy 8 identical GPSes,get all 8 talking to one PIC (faster is better) and do the code to figure out exactly where the device is.

It's not really 'rocket science' just looking at the problem from another 'angle'. When access to milsat gpses was blocked, using comsat gpses required 'outside the box' thinking.


Dear Mr. Temtronic.
Thanks for sharing with us.

It´s a good Idea to buy 8 gps(it´s not expensive, U$30,00 each). But I not understood the principle of operation. Each of 8 gps will give me an approximation. What to do with each gps data(Latitude, longitude, height)? Make an average?

I´ve heard about DGPS system. DO you know how it exactly works?

About LADAR, are you talking of lasers?
_________________
Eduardo Guilherme Brandt
SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:04 am     Reply with quote

temtronic wrote:
The basic solution involves using multiple GPS units per 'device'. Using 8 it is easy to get 1" resolution.


Would like to know more of how this works. Can you post a link to an explanation? Is it statistical manipulation? Can the 8 GPS modules share a single antenna? Do you need to force the 8 to use the same satellites?
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group