CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com

Error/Bug in == and != operators in 4.117 compiler on 24F?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GregReadUK



Joined: 24 Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Location: Kent, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Error/Bug in == and != operators in 4.117 compiler on 24F?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:43 am     Reply with quote

Hi Folks.

I am encountering a major problem in the latest compiler version 4.117. The != and == operators don't work as expected, e.g. 0 != 0.

Only tested on DEVICE:PIC24FJ64GA004
COMPILER VERSION:4.117

Can anyone offer any advice, see code example below.

Many Thanks,
Greg
Code:

#include <24FJ64GA004.h>
#device *=16

/* DEBUG FUSES THAT CAUSE VERIFICATION ERROR */
//#fuses DEBUG
//#device icd=true
#fuses NOWDT

#fuses ICSP1
#fuses NOWRT
#fuses NOPROTECT
#fuses NOJTAG

#fuses NOCKSFSM // NO FAIL SAFE CLOCK MONITOR
#fuses OSCIO   // OSC 2 IS A GENERAL PURPOSE INPUT
#fuses NOIESO   // THIS CAUSES IT TO BOOT OFF THE INTERNAL CRYSTAL IF EXTERNAL FAILED
//#fuses IESO

#fuses HS       // USE EXTERNAL HIGH SPEED OSCILLATOR
#fuses PR       // RUN OSCILLATOR AT HS OSCILLATOR SPEED
//   #use delay(clock=22118400)
#use delay(clock=25M)

// I2C definition for clock
//#USE I2C(MASTER, I2C1, FORCE_HW, RESTART_WDT)
#USE I2C(MASTER, SCL=PIN_B6, SDA=PIN_B5, RESTART_WDT)

#use rs232(baud=115200,parity=N,bits=8,errors,XMIT=PIN_B8,RCV=PIN_B13)
void Debug_putc(BYTE Data)
{
   putc(Data);
}

unsigned int8 ui1 = 0;
unsigned int8 ui2 = 0;

void main()
{
   
   int8 si1 = 0;
   int8 si2 = 0;

   unsigned int8 lui1 = 0;
   unsigned int8 lui2 = 0;

   unsigned int16 ui161 = 0;
   unsigned int16 ui162 = 0;

   unsigned int32 ui321 = 0;
   unsigned int32 ui322 = 0;

   printf(Debug_putc, "\r\nWhat are the != and == operators doing?\r\n");
   
   printf(Debug_putc, "DEVICE:%s\r\n", getenv("DEVICE"));
   printf(Debug_putc, "COMPILER VERSION:%s\r\n", getenv("VERSION_STRING"));

   if (ui1 != ui2)
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui1(%u) != ui2(%u)\r\n", ui1, ui2);   
   else
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui1(%u) == ui2(%u)\r\n", ui1, ui2);   

   if (ui1 == ui2)
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui1(%u) == ui2(%u)\r\n", ui1, ui2);   
   else
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui1(%u) != ui2(%u)\r\n", ui1, ui2);   

   if (si1 != si2)
      printf(Debug_putc, "si1(%u) != si2(%u)\r\n", si1, si2);   
   else
      printf(Debug_putc, "si1(%u) == si2(%u)\r\n", si1, si2);   

   if (lui1 != lui2)
      printf(Debug_putc, "lui1(%u) != lui2(%u)\r\n", lui1, lui2);   
   else
      printf(Debug_putc, "lui1(%u) == lui2(%u)\r\n", lui1, lui2);   

   if (ui161 != ui162)
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui161(%u) != ui162(%u)\r\n", ui161, ui162);   
   else
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui161(%u) == ui162(%u)\r\n", ui161, ui162);   

   if (ui321 != ui322)
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui321(%u) != ui322(%u)\r\n", ui321, ui322);   
   else
      printf(Debug_putc, "ui321(%u) == ui322(%u)\r\n", ui321, ui322);   

}

// Output produced -- Fails for 32bit, 16 bit and 8 bit ints
// What are the != and == operators doing?
// DEVICE:PIC24FJ64GA004
// COMPILER VERSION:4.117
// ui1(0) != ui2(0)
// ui1(0) != ui2(0)
// si1(0) != si2(0)
// lui1(0) != lui2(0)
// ui161(0) != ui162(0)
// ui321(0) != ui322(0)
GregReadUK



Joined: 24 Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Location: Kent, UK

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Fixed in 4.118
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:58 am     Reply with quote

Just tried 4.118 and it is fixed. thanks.

Results are now..

What are the != and == operators doing?
DEVICE:PIC24FJ64GA004
COMPILER VERSION:4.118
ui1(0) == ui2(0)
ui1(0) == ui2(0)
si1(0) == si2(0)
lui1(0) == lui2(0)
ui161(0) == ui162(0)
ui321(0) == ui322(0)
FvM



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 2337
Location: Germany

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:48 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
Just tried 4.118 and it is fixed. thanks.

Good, unfortunately there are sufficient unfixed bugs, like below, new in V4.114, reported Nov 01, 2010

http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=44256

Or a double bug, reported 7 month ago, still present in V4.118

Code:
#include <24FJ128GA106.h>
#use delay(clock=16000000,RESTART_WDT)
#use rs232(UART1,baud=38400,parity=N,bits=8)
#case
   typedef struct {
     unsigned int8 b1,b2,b3,b4;
   } BS, *PBS; 
   
   unsigned int32 mm = 16;
   unsigned int32 nn = 1024;
   BS bs = {1,2,3,4};
   PBS pbs = &bs;

void sub1(void)
{
   mm += nn/256;  // Wrong result due to register overwrite
/*   
0024A:  MOV.B   805,W0L
0024C:  MOV.B   806,W0L
0024E:  MOV.B   W0L,1
00250:  MOV.B   807,W0L
00252:  MOV     W0,W1
00254:  CLR.B   3
00256:  ADD     800
00258:  MOV     W1,W0
0025A:  ADDC    802,W0
0025C:  MOV     W0,802
*/   
   mm *= pbs->b3;
/*
0025E:  MOV     #2,W0
00260:  ADD     808,W0
00262:  MOV     W0,W4
00264:  MOV.B   [W4],W0L
00266:  MOV     802,W1
00268:  MOV.B   W0L,W2L
0026A:  CLR.B   5
0026C:  MOV     #0,W3
0026E:  MOV     [--W15],W0 // Stack-Error
00270:  CALL    200
00274:  MOV     W0,800
00276:  MOV     W1,802
*/   
}
void main(void)
{
   sub1();
   while (1);
}
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group