CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to support@ccsinfo.com
Ternary operator with strings problem

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gpsmikey



Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 588
Location: Kirkland, WA

View user's profile Send private message

Ternary operator with strings problem
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:21 pm     Reply with quote
Currently using compiler 4.114 with a PIC18F14K22 and ran into an issue in my code. I wanted to print either "ON" or "OFF" as part of the string to the LCD based on the HTR_pwr flag (int1) in my code so I tried to do it using the ternary operator ( condition ? if true : if false ) The code I used was:

Code:
printf(lcd_putc,"\fAIR=%Ld, HTR=%Ld\n",AIR_avg/10, HTR_avg/10);
printf(lcd_putc,"dT=%Ld Pw=%Lu %s",Tdelta, Pwidth, ((HTR_pwr==1) ? "ON":"OFF"));


Which compiles with no errors but when I run it, I get the first two results on the second line as expected for "dT" and "Pw", however, for the third field (declared in printf as a string with %s), what I get is a Pi symbol. Am I doing something not supported in the CCS compiler ? I had found several examples showing that basic construct via Google, however, this is not working as expected Very Happy

Thanks !
mikey
_________________
mikey
-- you can't have too many gadgets or too much disk space !
old engineering saying: 1+1 = 3 for sufficiently large values of 1 or small values of 3
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19366

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:30 am     Reply with quote
I would not have expected this to work (though see comment below), but would have expected an error about attempting to create a pointer to a constant. The problem is a little 'hidden' one (a search here will find a _lot_ about it...), where the PIC has the ROM and RAM address spaces in different memory areas, so there are two 'address 100' locations, one in ROM, and one in RAM. Now, remember that a string is not a basic 'type' in C, so what you are doing here is constructing two arrays, and potentially returning the address of each. Given that "ON", is in ROM, how can the address be constructed....
CCS has a 'work round' for this, in a statement PASS_STRINGS=IN_RAM, which when it meets a constant string, should automatically copy it to RAM, and allow a pointer to be constructed there (at a cost in performance). So with this selected, the potential for working was present.

However it also has a huge number of other 'work rounds', with constant strings met in a printf, being automatically handled. What appears to be happening here, is that the ternary operator, is preventing this work round from working...

I must admit it is a construct that ought to work, with PASS_STRINGS=IN_RAM selected (it doesn't), and should be reported to CCS on this basis. Without this option, it is not really 'legal', and should return an error.

Obviously, you can get the same result (at a cost in elegance), by generating RAM copies of the strings required. So:

Code:

char on[]="ON";
char off[]="OFF";

sprintf(output,"%s",((HTR_pwr==1) ? on:off));


I was 'hoping', that with the PASS_STRINGS option selected, it might work by explicitly casting - So:

(HTR_pwr==1) ? ((char *)"ON"):((char *)"OFF"))

But it still doesn't seem to work... :-(

So the answer is that on a 'bare' compiler running in the default configuration, I'd not have expected it to work, but even with an option selected that should make it work, it is not....

Best Wishes
gpsmikey



Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 588
Location: Kirkland, WA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:30 pm     Reply with quote
OK, thanks - I was afraid it was something like that but also expected the compiler to complain if it didn't like it. Not a peep (other than to warn me that "while(1)" never exits in my main loop :-)

mikey
_________________
mikey
-- you can't have too many gadgets or too much disk space !
old engineering saying: 1+1 = 3 for sufficiently large values of 1 or small values of 3
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group