CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

communication between multiple 16f877

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sith
Guest







communication between multiple 16f877
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:29 am     Reply with quote

Hi,
I'm looking around for a way to communicate between several 16F877's. But reading through the forum I get more and more confused... Could someone direct me to a nice piece of example code, or some documentation I could go through.
The plan is to firstly set up an easy RS232 comm between two PICs, then gradually increase the number with one beeing the master and polling the others for data (addressable). If that works nice I plan to put in RS485 or maybe go wireless.
All help and suggestions are welcome. I'm not asking for a clear cut piece of code (allthough that would be nice), a kick in the good direction would be appreciated as well.
arunb



Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 492
Location: India

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

RE:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:18 am     Reply with quote

Hi,

RS 485 is a better option compared to RS 232 for the kind of application you are making.

Wireless modules may be expensive compared to RS 485 transceivers, but you must also consider wiring costs Iin case of RS485) of the devices.

You could also consider ethernet based communication system. In this case you may have to use an 18F device that has a built-in ethernet transciever.

thanks
arunb
Sith
Guest







PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:28 am     Reply with quote

Hey arunb,

I totally agree that RS485 is the way to go compared to RS232, especially when bridging quite long distances. I'm still thinking or/if I would go wireless in some cases, seeing that it's going to be very hard in some cases to get wiring over there.
But nevertheless, I can't seem to find a good example where a master device is polling several (adressable) slaves. You wouldn't happen to know some good code, do you? Or anyone else for that matter?

thanks,
and see you later...
baltazar_aquino



Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 27

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:45 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
The plan is to firstly set up an easy RS232 comm between two PICs, then gradually increase the number with one beeing the master and polling the others for data (addressable).


I'ts quite difficult to post a code without having a schematic. Your target project is more of a hardware extensive than a software one. Bear in mind though that RS232 is not efficient in data sharing - it is actually not intended for that (RS485 is). There is a danger of corrupting your data not unless you use a software UASRT for each slave leaving only one slave connected to the hardware usart. For 2 PICs, its quite straightforward. Tx-Rx and Rx-Tx. Try to make one then post your code when you encounter problems.

__baltazar__
gjs_rsdi



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 468
Location: Bali

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

master/slave rs232
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:32 am     Reply with quote

if each slave has his own address and have int_RDA enabled can use rs232 when all on the same wire. the addressed will answer.
with max485 (or others) you can enable/disable each one, separate wires.
if you want to go wireless, in any case you will use one rftx and one rfrx for the master, (otherwise will be too much rf and too much price) so same as rs232.
make a simple rs232 program for the communication.
send 55h,AAh,slave address; from the master. the slaves will sinchronize on 55h,AAh and read the address. the slave with address matching will answer.
best regards
joseph
gjs_rsdi



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 468
Location: Bali

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

master/slave rs232
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:35 am     Reply with quote

simple master rutine. the slave rutine can be almost the same, RDA enabled all the time, TBE enabled on address match, disabled after sending check sum.
in the main I have made:
while(1)
{
restart_wdt();
enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
}
wait for interrupt
have no errors in compilation. version with more words working in my applications with 16F876A (16mhz) 18F252 (32mhz)
best regards
joseph
Code:
int slave10address=10;
short int slave10fail=0;
int scomtxwords=0;//switch for tx words to send
int scomtxwchs=0;//check sum word
int scomrxwords=0;
int scomrxwchs=0;
int scomrxw0=0;
int scomrxw1=0;
int scomrxw2=0;//data from the slave
int scomrxw3=0;
int slave10data=0;

//simple master program for one slave, rs232 hardware pins.
//variables
//master tx
#int_TBE
void TBE_isr()
{
   switch(scomtxwords)
   {
      case 0:
      {
         putc(85);//55h
         scomtxwchs=85;   
         scomtxwords++;      
      }
      break;
      case 1:
      {
         putc(170);//AAh
         scomtxwchs=255;   
         scomtxwords++;      
      }
      break;
      case 2:
      {
         putc(slave10address);
         scomtxwchs=scomtxwchs+slave10address;   
         scomtxwords++;      
      }
      break;
      case 3:
      {
         putc(scomtxwchs);//sends check dum lsb
         disable_interrupts(INT_TBE);
         scomtxwords=0;   
         enable_interrupts(INT_RDA);
         set_timer1(32768);//start counting scomrx time. if slave will not answer during this time, slave fail.
      }
      break;
   }
}
//master rx
#int_RDA
void RDA_isr()
{
   switch(scomrxwords)
   {
      case 0:
      {
         scomrxw0=getc();//55h
         if (scomrxw0==85)//testing if the word is 55h
         {
            scomrxwchs=85;
            scomrxwords++;
         }
         else
         {
            scomrxwords=0;
         }   
      }
      break;
      case 1:
      {
         scomrxw1=getc();//AAh
         if (scomrxw1==170)//testing if the word is AAh
         {
            scomrxwchs=255;
            scomrxwords++;
         }
         else
         {
            scomrxwords=0;
         }         
      }
      break;
      case 2:
      {
         scomrxw2=getc();
         scomrxwchs=scomrxwchs+scomrxw2;
         scomrxwords++;         
      }
      break;
      case 3:
      {
         scomrxw3=getc();
         if (scomrxwchs==scomrxw3)//if check sum correct
         {
            slave10fail=0;
            slave10data=scomrxw2;
         }
         else//check sum fail
         {
            slave10fail=1;
         }
         scomrxwords=0;   
         disable_interrupts(INT_RDA);            
      }
      break;
   }   
   
}
baltazar_aquino



Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 27

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:04 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
if each slave has his own address and have int_RDA enabled can use rs232 when all on the same wire. the addressed will answer.

as what I have said, tying together RS232 devices is not a common design practice otherwise, other protocols like RS 485, 422 would have not come out in the market. It may be ok for short distances but still you have to bear in mind that you don't have any efficient isolation from each slave - which means a failure of one may mean a failure of your whole system. Consider also the bus impedance as you add more slaves. Anyways, we are not setting any standard here. Just be prepared for any performance consequences as with this scheme you will not get any performance guarantee from any microchip data sheet simply because rs232 is not intended for this.
gjs_rsdi



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 468
Location: Bali

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

rs232
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:18 am     Reply with quote

same as I2C multi slave. if one will hold the line, all the system fails.
rs422/485was developed to reach big distances and safe emi/rfi because the reference is not the ground, is the difference beween +tx/-tx; +rx/-rx.
also in rs422/485 many systems are up to 32 masters & slaves on the same bus (data sheet max485 etc').
just with separate lines for each slave you will get the security you want.
how you will use the system with rf tx/rx? also with rs422/485?
best regards
joseph
baltazar_aquino



Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 27

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:13 am     Reply with quote

Quote:
how you will use the system with rf tx/rx? also with rs422/485?

With RS232, you can use the old proven multiplexing techniques:
TDM - Time division multiplexing, it means each slave is given a time slice for data exchange - similar to polling BUT - each slave has its hi-Z (tri-state) line which effectively isolates itself from the rest.
FDM - Frequency division multiplexing - each communication with a slave is on a different frequency/channel. Your bandwitdh depends on the modulation.
There are dedicated rf modules for rs232/485 that are available in electronic retial shops. In fact, I have here 2 units of 915Mhz transceiver capable of transmitting up to 500metes.Unfortunately , I cannot see any brand/name but is driven by an ATMEGA8 SMD & a tiny RF Unit.
Sith
Guest







PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:26 am     Reply with quote

Thanks very much for the example code. The RS232 suggestion was just to get things working, since I think it would be easier to set up then RS485. I totally agree that it's no valable option to use RS232 in a more elaborate setup.
I intend to use RS485 in RF rx/tx, or are there other/better protocols for this? I'm still looking around for suitable rf modules to hook up, maybe zigbee or such...
Anyway, I'm going to play around with the code and see where I end up...
red32terra



Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 7

View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger

Re: master/slave rs232
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:40 am     Reply with quote

gjs_rsdi wrote:
if each slave has his own address and have int_RDA enabled can use rs232 when all on the same wire. the addressed will answer.
with max485 (or others) you can enable/disable each one, separate wires.

make a simple rs232 program for the communication.
send 55h,AAh,slave address; from the master. the slaves will sinchronize on 55h,AAh and read the address. the slave with address matching will answer.
best regards
joseph




hi, i am just asking if this can be utilized in a power line communication set up? we have a line coupling unit and fsk mod/demod, do we need to build another hardware? thanks for any reply.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group