![](templates/subSilver/images/CCSLogo.jpg) |
![CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers](templates/subSilver/images/forumAd6.jpg) |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
meepa123
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 17
|
New I2C trouble, 18f4550 master versus 18f2550 slave. |
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:48 pm |
|
|
Master: 18f4550 @48mhz / 20mhz xtal
Code: |
#include <18f4550.h>
#fuses HS,PLL5,CPUDIV1,NOWDT,PUT,NOLVP
#use delay(clock=48000000)
#use rs232(baud=9600, xmit=PIN_C6, rcv=PIN_C7)
#build (reset=0x04,interrupt=0x08)
int encoder_value=0,encoder_target=0;
int1 encoder_bit=0,encoder_bit2=0,encoder_task=0;
int motortask;
#include <lcdbot.c>
#use i2c(master, sda=PIN_C4,scl=PIN_C5,slow)
int i2c_data[10];
int tmp;
int q;
void main()
{
setup_psp(PSP_DISABLED);
set_tris_c(0x00);
output_low(PIN_C4);
output_low(PIN_C5);
set_tris_c(0x30);
//setup_timer_0 (RTCC_INTERNAL|RTCC_DIV_4);
//enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
//enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER0);
lcd_init();
printf(LCD_PUTC,"START!!");
delay_ms(1000);
lcd_putc('\f');
while(1)
{
printf(LCD_PUTC,"Start2");
delay_ms(1000);
lcd_putc('\f');
i2c_start();
printf(LCD_PUTC,"1");
delay_ms(1);
i2c_write(0xa0);
printf(LCD_PUTC,"2");
delay_ms(1);
i2c_write(0x00);
printf(LCD_PUTC,"3");
delay_ms(1);
i2c_write(0x80);
printf(LCD_PUTC,"Datos");
lcd_putc('\f');
i2c_stop();
printf(LCD_PUTC,"Dato enviado");
delay_ms(1000);
lcd_putc('\f');
i2c_start();
i2c_write(0xa0);
i2c_write(0x00);
i2c_start();
i2c_write(0xa1);
tmp=i2c_read();
printf(LCD_PUTC,"%u",tmp);
i2c_stop();
}
}
|
I think slave code is not necessary at this moment, for the reasons i'm explaining now. The chip starts working, shows START!!! , START2, and then shows 1. And then nothing happens. The chip hung. So the thing gets hung in i2c_write, i suppose. It's not possible to use hardware MSSP, because of the needed pinout.
I've looked into the problem with an analogic scope, and i found out that both SDA and SCL stay high all the time. 2K2 pullups are used.
I hope you can help me. |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
unnamedplayer Guest
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:19 pm |
|
|
i heard hardware ssp gives less trouble than soft one.. |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
rnielsen
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 852 Location: Utah
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:55 pm |
|
|
Odds are, if you are using another PIC as the slave, the code inside it is not working properly. The slave can hold the I2C bus in a 'busy' state and the master will just set there twiddling it's thumbs until it is released. Look through this forum and look for the many examples for slaves. Try a few and see if you can get them to work. Then, once you find one that works, modify it little-by-little until you have it doing what you want.
Ronald |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
meereck
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 173
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:27 pm |
|
|
Dont know whether it helps, but fuse should be HSPLL instead of HS. |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|