View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ELCouz
Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Posts: 427 Location: Montreal,Quebec
|
Simple questions about BRGH1OK .... |
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:17 pm |
|
|
Dear members,
I've read this in the ccs manual...
Quote: |
BRGH1OK
Allow bad baud rates on chips that have baud rate problems.
Some parts have internal bugs with BRGH set to 1 and the compiler will not use this unless you specify BRGH1OK in the #USE RS232 directive.
|
Which pic have a bugged hardware UART ?
Do they have fixed the problem ?
I use very often the following pic 18F2550,18F2553,18F4550,18F4553
and some PIC24 and dsPIC30/33...
Do they have problems with the BRGH1OK rs-232 option?
Do microchip have a list of bugged devices that has a bug with BRGH1OK?
A little worried guy,
Regards,
Laurent |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:44 pm |
|
|
Go to http://www.google.com and search for this:
Quote: | Microchip BRGH errata |
|
|
|
ELCouz
Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Posts: 427 Location: Montreal,Quebec
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:55 pm |
|
|
thank's!
This is even more complete...
http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=2045
Complete silicon errata list... there's a lot of errata!!
Do microchip perform revision of their pic without changing the numbering system ?
Or they just leave it like that because they have «workarounds» ?
Have a nice day!
Laurent |
|
|
|