CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

NMEA parsing - baud rate and instruction time

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest








NMEA parsing - baud rate and instruction time
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:44 pm     Reply with quote

Hi,

I know this topic has been done to death, but hopefully this will be a quickie.
I'm new to CCS, although I have used PICBasic and C in general before.

A common method for parsing NMEA sentances seems to be to receive the first byte, check it, receive the second, check it, and so on, until you are sure you have the correct sentance. You can then either discard and start looking for another sentance, or keep on reading in the data.

My question concerns how processing of incoming data you can do without missing subseqent serial data. For instance, if running at 9600 baud, you receive a byte and check if it is '$'. If it is, you have found the start of a sentance, and want the next character - but by the time you have made this comparison, is there still time to receive it?
SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:58 pm     Reply with quote

The math is easy. If you are running at a 4MHz cyrystal speed you get 1 instruction every 4 cycles, so 1 MIPS or 1us per instruction.
If you use the CCS software UART it returns a byte at the start of the STOP bit. So you have the length of the STOP bit to do processing. 9600 baud means each bit is 1/9600 seconds long or 104us or 104 instructions. That is plenty to see if a byte is "$" and either put it in a buffer or punt to the seeking-start-of-message state.
If you have the luxury of a hardware UART it probably has a 2 character buffer. That gives you 104us per bit x 2 characters x 10 bits per character = 1667 instructions! That is enough time to tie your shoes, write a sonata, and maybe even do a floating point calculation.
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
Ttelmah
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:59 pm     Reply with quote

Depends totally on the speed of the chip.
You have just fractionally under two character times available in the hardware buffer, and for safety, say one. At 9600bps, this gives you just over 1mSec. On a chip at even 4Mhz, this is 1000 instruction times, while on one at 40MHz, it is 10000 instruction times. Even written carelessly, such a test, should be doable in under 100 instructions. Even better though, use the serial interrupt, and buffer the data, and if one test takes longer (perhaps actually decoding the numeric value), this won't matter.

Best Wishes
newguy



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 1908

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:06 pm     Reply with quote

What I do (I also parse NMEA gps data) is to receive one full NMEA sentence before I do any examination or manipulation of the data itself. Basically if I receive a '$' I know that an NMEA sentence is starting (so I reset the receive buffer to fill from the beginning), and if I receive a CR LF, I know I have a complete sentence in my receive buffer. It is then 'safe' to examine it.

I have a GPS receiver that can be configured to output as many or as little NMEA sentences as you wish. I have it configured to output only one. If your receiver can't be configured to only output one sentence, then the PIC is probably more than fast enough to do the processing you require on the fly, as SherpaDoug and TTelmah have already suggested.
Guest








PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:26 pm     Reply with quote

Thanks - You are right it is a simple calculation, it was the "1 instruction every 4 cycles" part that I was unsure about. Presumably some commands take more clock cycles to complete than others?

Cheers,

Ben
Guest








PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:11 pm     Reply with quote

Using the hardware USART ...

If I use the software USART, as long as I am ready to receive again by the end of the stop bit I am ok, giving me 104uS @ 9600 baud.

As far as I can see, the code written remains the same - the compiler generates hardware USART code if #use rs232... specifies the hardware pins, or implements a software solution if not.

Does it also set the RX buffer up as a circular buffer, so it contains the last 2 bytes to arrive constantly? I know previously using ASM and basic I have had to clear the buffer manually, or risk the PIC reseting...
SherpaDoug



Joined: 07 Sep 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: Cape Cod Mass USA

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:30 am     Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
Thanks - You are right it is a simple calculation, it was the "1 instruction every 4 cycles" part that I was unsure about. Presumably some commands take more clock cycles to complete than others?


The PIC16 and PIC17 series are RISC processors so every instriction except branches take one CPU cycle, or 4 clock cycles. I have not worked with the PIC18s so I am not sure they follow the rule.

With the software UART the compiler does not use any buffer at all. It recieves the serial bits in real time. I have never used an internal hardware UART so others can answer your question better.
_________________
The search for better is endless. Instead simply find very good and get the job done.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group