View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
Installing PCM can make PCH fail. |
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:49 pm |
|
|
I have PCM and PCH installed in the same directory:
c:\Program Files\Picc
Sometimes, I temporarily install a different version of PCM
in order to test problems that are reported on this board.
When I'm done, I re-install PCM vs. 3.188.
I've noticed that when I do this, PCH no longer works properly.
Just now, I started programming a few production boards and
they programmed and verified OK, but the boards gave me an
error message on the LCD -- for two units in a row. So I got
suspicious and re-installed PCH and re-programmed the units.
That fixed the problem. This has happened with PCH 3.178
and 3.188.
I think that PCM works OK if PCH is installed after PCM. It's just
if you install PCM last, then it damages PCH.
In the past when this happened, I got an error message when
I tried to compile with PCH. (I forget what the message was).
This newer problem is more disturbing, because I didn't notice
it until I tested the boards. So I put a note in the program to
re-install PCH and re-compile before programming any units.
I'm using ICD2 as the programmer.
Maybe the solution is to put the two compilers in different directories.
Is that how PCWH does it ? |
|
|
rnielsen
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 852 Location: Utah
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 4:43 pm |
|
|
I have PCWH and it stuffs everything into the same directory.
Ronald |
|
|
kypec
Joined: 20 Sep 2003 Posts: 54
|
PCWH multiple versions used concurrently |
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:50 pm |
|
|
Hi,
I'm using PCWH and I got used to install every new release of it
in a different directory, like \PICC3188\ \PICC3190\ etc.
That way I can work with any compiler revision whenever I want to
without needing to re-install every time I worked on some project
with this PICC rev or that PICC rev
kypec |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 1:16 am |
|
|
That sounds like a good idea. I'll keep my production versions
safe and unchanged in my main directory, and put the temporary
test versions in another directory. |
|
|
Darren Rook
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 287 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:55 am |
|
|
I think one problem is devices.dat. PCM and PCH share the same devices.dat file. The problem is that the format of this file may change with different releases. So if you have two different versions installed in the same directory, devices.dat may be the right one for one version but won't work for another. |
|
|
rnielsen
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 852 Location: Utah
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 8:39 am |
|
|
I like the idea of installing each version in it's own directory. Do you have multiple icons set up so you can load each one up? From what I understand, CCS puts an icon on the desktop that points to the last install.
Ronald |
|
|
Douglas Richard
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 49 Location: Concord NH
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 9:42 am |
|
|
I have PCM and PCH installed in different directories. Seems to work fine. |
|
|
Humberto
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 1215 Location: Buenos Aires, La Reina del Plata
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:58 pm |
|
|
Hi folks,
Regarding versions, I´m still using version 3.184 as stable and reliable.
I would like to know which version are using for your real work.
Humberto |
|
|
kypec
Joined: 20 Sep 2003 Posts: 54
|
Icons renamed |
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 1:02 am |
|
|
rnielsen wrote: | I like the idea of installing each version in it's own directory. Do you have multiple icons set up so you can load each one up? From what I understand, CCS puts an icon on the desktop that points to the last install.
Ronald |
Yes, I manually renamed each desktop icon as soon as the most recent release has been installed and default icon has been created on my desktop.
kypec |
|
|
|