I sent a problem report to CCS as code that works for sprintf in 3.1.91 fails in 3.2.0.1. The response was to send an example. I'll do this if I have to but it is annoying to bounce the problem report back to me for further work where it is clear there is a problem, at least in the test I did with existing code.
Anyone else having sprinf problems? _________________ Al Testani
dyeatman
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 1933 Location: Norman, OK
sprintf
Posted: Sat May 29, 2004 8:16 am
Al,
Not to defend CCS but I also do software work and many times the user is doing something wrong so I always ask for an example to confirm it is a bug and not user error.
I understand you indicated it was OK in a prevous version but it may be a syntactical thing that the earlier version allowed and this one doen't.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum