What's new at CCS

New PIC16F1937 Kit for Enhanced Mid-Range Core Development

CCS C Compiler New Version Release - 4.100

Customer Testimonials

"...we are just electrical engineers who were forced to learn C just a little if we wanted to use the CCS compiler to make our black boxes smarter. For years we just wrote assembler but then saw some examples of how code efficient the CCS compiler was and have never looked back."

"CCS built-in functions are a good option in my opinion."

"CCS is a gem in that their compiler has proven (to me) to be much better supported than other vendors at a higher price. Funny how that works."

"Some days I think <deleted> likes to torture the common programmer with ASM. I can read the language – but when importing into a C environment, it's usually a conversion bummer somehow. If you can read the ASM and can do a conversion to C, you'd be surprised how efficient CCS code tends to be."

"As others have said - you can pick one compiler over another based on the libraries that they supply. These are the reasons I chose CCS; Pretty much standard C, Very cost effective, Very efficient (compiled code wise - at least for me), Has a bunch of really useful functions already written (delay_ms, RS232 serial, etc). I think I've used C since probably 1989 and CCS since 1994 - that's pretty good leverage for any language."